Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
03 July 2025 by Keith Ford

ASIC levy for investment and super sector set to rise 9%

The corporate regulator has released its estimated industry levies for FY2024–25, with the cost for the investment management and superannuation ...
icon

Diversified portfolios deliver for industry funds as markets flourish

Another strong year for equities, both domestic and global, has driven largely positive returns for these industry super ...

icon

VanEck warns of looming US asset unwind as key risk signals flash red

VanEck has signalled an impending major unwinding in US assets, after issuing a warning that the world is largely ...

icon

Metrics makes 2 acquisitions ahead of consumer lending expansion

Metrics Credit Partners has completed the acquisition of Taurus Financial Group and BC Investment Group as it looks to ...

icon

Barclays Australia country CEO set to relocate to Singapore

Barclays has announced Richard Satchwell will relocate to Singapore to take charge of the region’s debt and equity ...

icon

AMP sued by Dexus over property disposal

AMP has announced to the ASX that it is being sued by property fund manager Dexus regarding the sale of its real estate ...

VIEW ALL

More funds eye life-cycle strategies

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Industry funds are taking a closer look at life-cycle strategies, as the products continue to evolve.

Industry superannuation funds are taking a closer look at life-cycle strategies, according to actuarial and consultancy firm Milliman.

"The retail market is certainly more advanced than the industry fund sector, with Fortnum Financial Advisors now offering this solution via E-Clipse online and others in the works," Milliman financial risk management practice leader Wade Matterson said.

"Having said that, industry funds are beginning to make progress in this direction and we are in advanced discussions with a number of them."

Life-cycle strategies have historically taken an asset allocation approach, whereby the exposure to growth assets is gradually reduced as the investor approaches retirement.

 
 

The idea is this reduces the risk of substantial drops in value during the last stages of a person's working life.

But in the United States, where these funds have been widely taken up, they did not live up to expectations during the global financial crisis and reported some significant negative returns.

Matterson said life-cycle strategies had changed dramatically as a result.

"As we are now well aware, asset allocation is a poor proxy for the risk that an investment is exposed to and, whilst diversification is necessary, it is imperfect," he said.

"What is important is the shape of the return distribution to which members are exposed."

Instead of reducing the exposure to growth assets as one approaches retirement, the new generation of life-cycle funds adopt capital protection strategies and set volatility targets that are managed through dynamic asset allocation to mitigate the risk of losing one's life savings.

The other benefit of that approach was investors could maintain a relatively high exposure to growth assets, Matterson said.

"Reducing growth exposure into retirement substantially impacts the likelihood of a member exhausting their superannuation assets early," he said.

Milliman research showed de-risking at the point of retirement from 70 per cent exposure - the average allocation of a balanced fund - to 50 per cent could more than double the likelihood of exhausting a member's superannuation assets at the age of 90.

The Cooper review pointed out the potential benefits of a life-cycle strategy and under the Stronger Super reforms, superannuation funds will be allowed to use life-cycle funds as their MySuper options.

But Matterson said funds did not have to opt for a stand-alone fund and could also offer this strategy as an overlay to existing funds.

"The largest issue for funds is whether they implement these strategies via member choice or through their default structures," he said.

"The potential attractiveness of a member-specific overlay is that their existing investment options could continue to operate as they do currently, but members would be able to add or remove the overlay as necessary.

"I think, over time, default strategies will become more sophisticated and tailored to fund members at different life stages and we're currently working with a few clients on assessing the implications of this."