Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several ...
icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

VIEW ALL

Opposition should outline its super plans: AIST

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

AIST calls for the coalition to outline its plans for tackling Australia's pension problems.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has challenged the coalition to outline its plans for tackling the funding challenges of Australia's ageing population.

The association, which represents the not-for-profit super sector, said the coalition needed to come up with an alternative policy after rejecting the government's proposal to increase the superannuation guarantee from 9 to 12 per cent.

"It's not good enough for the coalition to simply quote selected comments from the Henry Tax Review, when Dr Henry himself warned that the review should be considered in its entirety," AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds said.

"If the coalition really believes compulsory super should stay at the current 9 per cent level then it needs to explain how it plans to ensure the average Australian worker will be able to retire with dignity and how future generations of taxpayers will be able to fund the needs of our rapidly ageing population," Reynolds said.

 
 

"If the coalition has the solution to these demographic challenges, then let's hear it," she said.

The vast majority of taxpayers would have less super and experience a drop in take-home pay under the Henry Review recommendations compared to the government's super reform package, which included a super rebate for low-income earners, Reynolds said.

AIST was also opposed to the Henry recommendations because of the need for complex data matching requirements.

"Raising the superannuation levy is about creating a sustainable retirement incomes system that will meet the demographic challenges facing Australia" she said.