lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
17 October 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Climate inaction threatens super fund returns, warns report

Delayed climate action could wipe hundreds of billions from superannuation balances by 2050, according to new analysis from Ortec Finance
icon

Chalmers to embark on global investment and policy mission

Treasurer Jim Chalmers is set to travel to the US and South Korea to promote Australia’s economic strengths amid global ...

icon

Physical gold ETFs crack top 5 by flows in September

Investors seeking havens from geopolitical risks have prompted gold ETFs to see their strongest-ever monthly inflows, ...

icon

Fidante broadens alts offering with new London-based partner

Global investment management firm Fidante, part of Challenger Limited, has formed a strategic partnership with UK-based ...

icon

IMF flags tech boom, repricing threats rising

A significant market repricing could be on the horizon and has the potential to impact aggregate wealth and consumption ...

icon

Betashares warns against leveraged stock ETFs

Heavily leveraged single stock ETFs are the equivalent of gambling and have no place in Australia, according to ...

VIEW ALL

Privatisation considered for Future Fund

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

The privatisation of the Future Fund is part of a welfare policy shake-up by a national think tank.

Reliance on the country's welfare system could be eased by redistributing money in the Future Fund to Australians said a report by the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS).

The report, "The Government Giveth and the Government Taketh Away", looks at a range of strategies that would assist people from opting out of a welfare system.

One option is to transfer the money from the Future Fund to all Australians in the form of 20 million new personal savings accounts.

These accounts, called personal future fund (PFF), could be used for health or unemployment benefits.

This policy makes economic sense and is ethically justifiable, said CIS social research director Peter Saunders.

"Money transferred from the government's Future Fund into 20 million individual accounts would not be spent on immediate consumption, but would be used to replace present or future calls on government benefits or services," Saunders said.

"Assuming the value of the Future Fund reaches $60 billion by 2008, and equal share-out among all permanent residents in Australia (including children) could provide everyone with their own PFF worth around $3,000," the report said.

An additional $750 million would have to be earmarked each year after that so that newborn children could have a PFF equivalent to the value of those funds established earlier. People moving to Australia would have to establish their own PFF before taking up residence in the country.

These PFFs could be linked to people's existing superannuation accounts in order to share administrative costs. These accounts could be run by the superannuation fund's financial managers.