Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
14 May 2025 by Jasmine Siljic

Tariff truce reignites risk appetite as investors flock to equities

Australian investors poured $2.1 billion into international equity ETFs in April, more than double the previous month, as a sharp reversal in US ...
icon

Aussie ETF market surges past $250bn as bitcoin dominates

Bitcoin has replaced gold as the asset class “du jour” in April, according to VanEck, as the broader Australian ETF ...

icon

Investor gloom lifts as recession fears subside, BofA survey finds

Global investor sentiment brightened in May, according to Bank of America’s latest Global Fund Manager Survey, as ...

icon

CBA lifts cash profit 6% on lending strength

The big four bank has posted a 6 per cent increase in its third quarter cash profit on the back of higher lending

icon

Chalmers stands firm on $3m super tax, Hume hopes he ‘sees the light’

The Treasurer has shown no signs of wavering on the construction of the controversial tax, while Liberal senator Jane ...

icon

Macquarie subsidiary accused of misleading market with billions in short sales

The corporate regulator is suing a subsidiary of Macquarie Group alleging it engaged in misleading conduct by ...

VIEW ALL

Privatisation considered for Future Fund

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

The privatisation of the Future Fund is part of a welfare policy shake-up by a national think tank.

Reliance on the country's welfare system could be eased by redistributing money in the Future Fund to Australians said a report by the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS).

The report, "The Government Giveth and the Government Taketh Away", looks at a range of strategies that would assist people from opting out of a welfare system.

One option is to transfer the money from the Future Fund to all Australians in the form of 20 million new personal savings accounts.

These accounts, called personal future fund (PFF), could be used for health or unemployment benefits.

This policy makes economic sense and is ethically justifiable, said CIS social research director Peter Saunders.

"Money transferred from the government's Future Fund into 20 million individual accounts would not be spent on immediate consumption, but would be used to replace present or future calls on government benefits or services," Saunders said.

"Assuming the value of the Future Fund reaches $60 billion by 2008, and equal share-out among all permanent residents in Australia (including children) could provide everyone with their own PFF worth around $3,000," the report said.

An additional $750 million would have to be earmarked each year after that so that newborn children could have a PFF equivalent to the value of those funds established earlier. People moving to Australia would have to establish their own PFF before taking up residence in the country.

These PFFs could be linked to people's existing superannuation accounts in order to share administrative costs. These accounts could be run by the superannuation fund's financial managers.