Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several ...
icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

VIEW ALL

Lessons from sub-prime

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
4 minute read

According to Mckinsey and Co, banks need to make sweeping regulatory changes to prevent another sub-prime crisis.

Sweeping global banking regulatory and industry changes are required to ensure that the current sub-prime credit crisis is not repeated and the ongoing effect eased, according to management consulting firm McKinsey and Company.

"The excess greed cannot continue and the general population are very cynical about the robustness of the system," McKinsey and Company expert principal Mark Lawrence said at a recent conference.

Lawrence said in order to repair balance sheets, banks must look to rebuild their capital base, reduce costs, strengthen risk management and capture strategic opportunities where possible.

"Institutions need to have an integration of risk across all different businesses, and create a strong risk culture. Institutions also need to have greater courage to act," he said

 
 

The creation of industry committees such as the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) Committee on Market Best Practices were also instrumental in the development of global regulatory responses, Lawrence said.

Both bodies handed down reports in 2008.

"The global regulatory bodies' findings that are to be implemented over several years, will address many of the shortcomings in the industry," Lawrence said.

According to Lawrence, banks and securities firms globally have recognised 60 - 90 percent of projected losses from exposure to the US credit markets.

"However, there is a strong possibility that some securities will be revalued and some credit losses will be realised when defaults come in. There could be more losses to come," he said.