Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
05 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

APRA funds, party dissent behind Labor’s alleged Div 296 pause

APRA-regulated funds have reportedly raised concerns with the government over Division 296, as news of potential policy tweaks makes headlines
icon

Fed credibility erosion may propel gold above US$5k/oz, Goldman Sachs says

Goldman Sachs has warned threats to the Fed’s independence could lift gold above forecasts, shattering previous records

icon

Market pundits divided on availability of ‘reliable diversifiers’

While some believe reliable diversifiers are becoming increasingly rare, others disagree – citing several assets that ...

icon

AMP eyes portable alpha expansion as strategy makes quiet comeback

Portable alpha, long considered complex and costly, is experiencing a quiet resurgence as investors navigate ...

icon

Ten Cap remains bullish on equities as RBA eases policy

The investment management firm’s latest monthly update has cited rate cuts, labour strength and China’s recovery as key ...

icon

Super funds can handle tax tweaks, but not political meddling

The CEO of one of Australia’s largest super funds says his outfit has become an expert at rolling with regulatory ...

VIEW ALL

ASX served with $1m claim

  •  
By Stephen Blaxhall
  •  
2 minute read

The July shut down of ASX-administered trades has fostered its first claim in the Federal Court.

The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) has been served its first claim in the aftermath of the July 25 Sydney Futures Exchange (SFE) trade cancellations.

Six firms are demanding a total of $985,848 from the ASX through a claim lodged in the Federal Court of Australia.

The companies named in the claim are Aminute, as Trustee of the Aminute Superannuation Fund, TransMarket Trading, Firehorse, Plutus Commodity Management, Kestrel Trading and Biskra Aotearoa.

The claimants argue that trader error caused the SFE to be shut down temporarily, causing them to lose money.

 
 

Following a review of the incident the ASX said it had taken appropriate action in accordance with its operating rules.

According to market speculation, the trigger for the incident was an input error relating to a spread order to buy bank bill contracts and sell three year bonds. The ASX refutes this.
 
"The cancelled trades were the result of interaction of the existing orders in the central market and the subsequent entry of participant stop-loss orders," the ASX said.