lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
14 October 2025 by Olivia Grace-Curran

Oceania misses out as impact dollars drift

Despite strong global momentum in impact investing, allocations to Oceania from global investors are retreating – down 21 per cent over six years, ...
icon

Fortitude launches evergreen small-cap private equity fund

Private markets manager Fortitude Investment Partners has launched a small-cap private equity fund in evergreen ...

icon

BlackRock deems US dollar drop ‘not that unusual’

Despite concerns about the greenback’s safe haven status and a recent pullback from US assets, the asset manager has ...

icon

Australia spared in Binance pegged asset glitch

Binance has confirmed no users in Australia were impacted by technical glitches on pegged assets following the broader ...

icon

Ausbil expands active ETF range with 2 new tickers

Ausbil is set to broaden its active ETF offerings through the introduction of two new ETFs concentrating on global ...

icon

Monetary policy ‘still a little restrictive’ as easing effects build

In holding the cash rate steady in September, the RBA has judged that policy remains restrictive even as housing and ...

VIEW ALL

A new world order - Column

  •  
By Stephen Blaxhall
  •  
2 minute read

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.
 
There are currently seven long-only managers charging performance fees: Platypus, BT, Challenger, Hunter Hall, MIR, Portfolio Partners and Prime Partners. Fees range from 15 to 20.5 basis points.
 
"When we looked at it in more detail the investment objectives of these funds ranged from 4 to 5 per cent above the benchmark, which we thought was appropriate against the benchmark, as it is a large amount of alpha," S&P fund analyst Marcus Hanel said.
 
"Higher fees, including performance fees, are acceptable if the investor is being compensated for the additional cost."
 
However, Hanel said if funds were going to charge a higher performance fee they needed to show a long and successful track record.
 
"If a manager fails to reach its performance objective, they should not be given a second chance until investors have recouped their losses," he said.
 
"I think this will come out in the wash over the next couple of years, I guess, but at the moment some of these managers are performing strongly."
 
He said advisers also needed to keep in mind that they could access good high conviction managers, such as Perpetual and Lazard, that did not charge performance fees.
 
"Fund managers have many alternatives when designing performance-based fee structures, and S&P feels that some fail to align investors' interests with their own," he said.