Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
07 May 2025 by Jasmine Siljic

Australia marked as ‘priority’ by Apollo with new asset-backed finance offering

US alternative credit manager Apollo Global Management views Australia as a “priority market”. Local investment manager Channel Capital announced ...
icon

NAB reports $3.58bn in cash earnings, share price rides optimism wave

The bank’s share price has jumped on Wednesday morning following the release of its financial results for 1H25

icon

MA Financial joins US$1.7bn JV to tap US middle market

A local alternative asset manager has joined forces with a US-based specialist lender and a Japanese financial giant to ...

icon

Regulator cracks down on ‘multiple and significant’ breaches at Macquarie Bank

The corporate regulator has taken further action against Macquarie Bank, citing “multiple and significant” compliance ...

icon

Obsolete or evolving? Industry leaders clash on future of 60/40

The traditional 60/40 portfolio model, long a cornerstone of diversified investment strategies, is increasingly under ...

icon

ASIC mulls ‘thoughtful’ capital markets submissions amid calls for regulatory restraint

As stakeholders continue to publish their responses to ASIC’s consultation on capital markets, ASIC deputy chair Sarah ...

VIEW ALL

A new world order - Column

  •  
By Stephen Blaxhall
  •  
2 minute read

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.
 
There are currently seven long-only managers charging performance fees: Platypus, BT, Challenger, Hunter Hall, MIR, Portfolio Partners and Prime Partners. Fees range from 15 to 20.5 basis points.
 
"When we looked at it in more detail the investment objectives of these funds ranged from 4 to 5 per cent above the benchmark, which we thought was appropriate against the benchmark, as it is a large amount of alpha," S&P fund analyst Marcus Hanel said.
 
"Higher fees, including performance fees, are acceptable if the investor is being compensated for the additional cost."
 
However, Hanel said if funds were going to charge a higher performance fee they needed to show a long and successful track record.
 
"If a manager fails to reach its performance objective, they should not be given a second chance until investors have recouped their losses," he said.
 
"I think this will come out in the wash over the next couple of years, I guess, but at the moment some of these managers are performing strongly."
 
He said advisers also needed to keep in mind that they could access good high conviction managers, such as Perpetual and Lazard, that did not charge performance fees.
 
"Fund managers have many alternatives when designing performance-based fee structures, and S&P feels that some fail to align investors' interests with their own," he said.