Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
27 June 2025 by [email protected]

ASIC’s private credit probe expected to home in on retail space

IFM Investors expects ASIC’s ongoing surveillance and action in the private credit market to focus predominately on direct investment by retail ...
icon

Don’t write off the US just yet, Fidelity warns

Despite rising geopolitical risks and volatile macro signals, Fidelity has cautioned investors against a full-scale ...

icon

Australia’s economic growth to accelerate despite ‘fragile global environment’

The pace of economic growth in Australia is expected to “grind higher over coming quarters” off the back of lower ...

icon

Super sector welcomes US retreat on tax measure that risked $3.5bn in losses

The superannuation sector has welcomed confirmation that a controversial US tax provision will be removed

icon

Managed fund inflows surge as Australian investors lean into global volatility

Australian investors have poured billions into managed funds in 2025, demonstrating surprising resilience amid global ...

icon

AustralianSuper slammed for alleged ESG breach

The super fund has entered the cross hairs of Market Forces due to its large shareholding in Whitehaven Coal

VIEW ALL

A new world order - Column

  •  
By Stephen Blaxhall
  •  
2 minute read

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.

Performance fees traditionally linked to high-risk alternative investments are becoming more common with high conviction long-only funds, according to a Standard and Poor's (S&P) Australian equities report.
 
There are currently seven long-only managers charging performance fees: Platypus, BT, Challenger, Hunter Hall, MIR, Portfolio Partners and Prime Partners. Fees range from 15 to 20.5 basis points.
 
"When we looked at it in more detail the investment objectives of these funds ranged from 4 to 5 per cent above the benchmark, which we thought was appropriate against the benchmark, as it is a large amount of alpha," S&P fund analyst Marcus Hanel said.
 
"Higher fees, including performance fees, are acceptable if the investor is being compensated for the additional cost."
 
However, Hanel said if funds were going to charge a higher performance fee they needed to show a long and successful track record.
 
"If a manager fails to reach its performance objective, they should not be given a second chance until investors have recouped their losses," he said.
 
"I think this will come out in the wash over the next couple of years, I guess, but at the moment some of these managers are performing strongly."
 
He said advisers also needed to keep in mind that they could access good high conviction managers, such as Perpetual and Lazard, that did not charge performance fees.
 
"Fund managers have many alternatives when designing performance-based fee structures, and S&P feels that some fail to align investors' interests with their own," he said.