lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
14 October 2025 by Olivia Grace-Curran

Oceania misses out as impact dollars drift

Despite strong global momentum in impact investing, allocations to Oceania from global investors are retreating – down 21 per cent over six years, ...
icon

Fortitude launches evergreen small-cap private equity fund

Private markets manager Fortitude Investment Partners has launched a small-cap private equity fund in evergreen ...

icon

BlackRock deems US dollar drop ‘not that unusual’

Despite concerns about the greenback’s safe haven status and a recent pullback from US assets, the asset manager has ...

icon

Australia spared in Binance pegged asset glitch

Binance has confirmed no users in Australia were impacted by technical glitches on pegged assets following the broader ...

icon

Ausbil expands active ETF range with 2 new tickers

Ausbil is set to broaden its active ETF offerings through the introduction of two new ETFs concentrating on global ...

icon

Monetary policy ‘still a little restrictive’ as easing effects build

In holding the cash rate steady in September, the RBA has judged that policy remains restrictive even as housing and ...

VIEW ALL

Short-selling ban may have increased volatility

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

Although the ban on short selling did achieve some of its objectives, ASIC admits it also increased volatility and decreased liquidity.

The ban on short selling securities in Australia may have increased volatility and reduced market liquidity, ASIC has admitted in a new report.

In a review of the effects of the ban on short selling securities between 2008 and 2009, the corporate regulator acknowledged it did not fully grasp the effects the ban would have on markets and said any future measures would benefit from lessons learned.

"The ban on short selling may have exacerbated market volatility. It also potentially inhibited price discovery in the market and may have reduced market liquidity," ASIC said in the report, "Short Selling: Post-implementation review".

The short-selling measures also may have led to a number of other negative effects on market participants, including higher bid/ask spreads, lower turnover and a reduced ability for price discovery.

"These negative impacts may have been exacerbated by the length of the period of the Australian short-selling ban compared with those in other highly-developed markets," ASIC said.

The corporate regulator also acknowledged some alternative fund managers had incurred significant costs as a result of new compliance requirements and the inability to execute their trading strategies.

"The main costs incurred were the costs to implement reporting and other compliance arrangements and the loss of revenue and business opportunities because of the inability to short sell," it said.

"Some fund managers using alternative investment strategies were significantly affected in this way."

But ASIC also said the ban had delivered on a number of the objectives it aimed to achieve.

"By aligning the regulation of short selling in Australia with the approach taken by other regulators, and requiring permitted short sales to be disclosed, the short-selling measures reduced the risks that might occur as a result of short selling of Australian financial sector entities or other systemically important entities," it said.

"The reduction in settlement failure also assisted in maintaining the orderly functioning of Australian financial markets."

Although the regulator said it would not shy away from considering a short-selling ban in the future, it also indicated a total ban might not be necessary again.

"The market and regulators' understanding of short selling and its impact on trading conditions has deepened over the past three years and any future calls for taking measures similar to those of September 2008 would have the benefit of the lessons learned from the earlier short-selling ban," it said.

"In particular, the disclosure regime for covered short sales and short positions and the, now permanent, prohibition on naked short selling may limit the need for a total ban in future periods of market turmoil."