Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
29 August 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Investors drawn to private markets for genuine ESG exposure, says manager

Federation Asset Management has experienced growing interest from investors seeking to invest responsibly through private market opportunities
icon

Manager overhauls tech ETF to target Nasdaq’s top players

BlackRock is repositioning its iShares Future Tech Innovators ETF to focus on the top 30 Nasdaq non-financial firms, ...

icon

Dixon Advisory inquiry no longer going ahead as Senate committee opts out

The inquiry into collapsed financial services firm Dixon Advisory will no longer go ahead, with the Senate economics ...

icon

Latest performance test results prompt further calls for test overhaul

APRA’s latest superannuation performance test results raise critical questions around how effective the test currently ...

icon

HESTA, ART to challenge ATO’s position on imputation credits in Federal Court

Industry fund HESTA has filed an appeal against an ATO decision on tax offsets from franking credits, with the ...

icon

Net flows, Altius acquisition push Australian Ethical FUM to record high

The ethical investment manager has reported record funds under management of $13.94 billion following positive net ...

VIEW ALL

IFM plans permanently lower fees

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

IFM plans to lower its investment management fees in September.

Industry Funds Management (IFM) is conducting a review of its investment management fees and expects to announce a decrease later this year.

In October last year, IFM provided a one-off fee rebate of 12.5 per cent to its clients, and IFM chief executive Brett Himbury said the firm was now looking to offer a permanently lower fee level.

"We are finalising our price review and are likely to move to a permanently adjusted MER (management expense ratio)," Himbury said yesterday.

He said he expected to be able to announce the new price structure in September.

 
 

"Prices will be going down," he said.

The reduction in fees was the result of IFM's rapid expansion in the past six years, he said.

The company currently has $34 billion in assets under management and is still growing.

But IFM would also continue to invest in its business, Himbury said.

The asset manager was looking to establish an infrastructure debt strategy in its London office by the end of the year, he said.

"We are establishing a debt team in London. We have been doing it for 14 years in Australia, so why not do it in London?"

He pointed out that infrastructure debt currently had more attractive yields than sovereign bonds, while the sustainability of those returns also looked promising.

Furthermore, the crisis in Europe had led to growing opportunities in distressed debt, he said.

"A lot of this debt is held against good-quality assets, [but] the owners are no longer in a position to fund that debt, and this creates the opportunity for a fund manager like IFM to step in," he said.

In December last year, IFM hired a small-cap team from Macquarie to establish a fund in Sydney, headed by IFM listed equities executive director Neil Carter.

Carter yesterday said the structural changes in the funds management industry convinced him to move from Macquarie to IFM, because the latter had a more sustainable model.

"There is a lot of fee pressure. In a low-return environment fees have got to come down. We wanted to be on the right side of the trade," he said.

IFM was owned by 32 industry super funds and that enabled a greater flexibility in fees, he said.

"They [IFM shareholders] are not looking to make a big fat margin," he said.

Many funds management businesses have traditionally had a strong focus on retail clients, because they form the segment with the highest margin.

But those inflows had strongly decreased since the financial crisis, Carter said.

"I won't go as far as saying retail is dead, but the focus is now on SMSFs (self-managed super funds)," he said. 

Many fund managers have found it difficult to gain access to SMSF investors as they are not a homogenous group, while they also tend to favour direct investments.

"SMSFs are difficult to service," Carter said.