lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Appointments
16 October 2025

Allianz Retire+ announces new CEO amid leadership changes

Allianz Retire+ has announced major leadership changes with the appointment of a new CEO and distribution heads. Described as a leadership team ...
icon

Tyndall AM expands small caps team with deputy portfolio manager

A new deputy portfolio manager has been appointed by the asset manager for the Tyndall Australian Small Companies Fund

icon

Additional rate cut ‘still on the table’ following unemployment data

State Street has suggested that the Reserve Bank may cut interest rates in November, following September's four-year ...

icon

Small caps stage comeback as investors hunt for growth and diversification

Global and Australian small-cap equities are attracting renewed investor attention as they deliver outsized returns, ...

icon

Cyber security industry poised for growth following government threat report

The ASD’s latest cyber threat report has emphasised increasing demand for robust cyber security measures, with ...

icon

CIO warns pre-GFC red flags on display in private credit

An investment firm’s director has warned that investor complacency, tight credit spreads and poor transparency in ...

VIEW ALL

Super fund members don't understand risk: Henry

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

Superannuation members do not understand the level of risk they take in default fund options Ken Henry says.

Former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry has questioned whether superannuation members understand the risk embedded in the existing default fund options.

Henry argued that more thought has to go into the sequencing of returns, shifting away from equities and towards fixed interest assets in the later stages of accumulation.

"How many superannuation members understand the risk that they are taking on a selective default portfolios? A very, very small percentage, I would say," Henry said at an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) investment conference on Friday.

"How many of them were told in 2007 that your portfolio has done very, very well over the past 15 years or so, but you must understand it is always going to be that way. How many were told? Maybe some [members] in some sectors were told, but very few would have understood it."

Henry argued that the global financial crisis had caused major loss of savings of those who were close to retirement, while the level of losses could have been reduced by shifting away from equities in the later stages of accumulation.

"What should be a key concern is sequence [of returns]," he said.

Henry also said the fact that many members have opted for the default option was a sign of the level of perceived difficulty in making investment choices, rather than the default being best suited to their circumstances.

"It is not that the default option is perfectly tailored to their personal circumstance, they just assume that: 'Someone knows more about it than me'," he said.

"We should be thinking much more seriously about what kind of portfolio is appropriate for Australian superannuation members."

Potential options could also include a form of portfolio insurance, Henry said.

He also warned that if the industry did not address these issues, it could lose support from the general public.

"This industry is a world class industry, there are very few countries that have anything like this, but don't take it for granted that it will always enjoy the broad measure of support that it always has enjoyed up to now," he said.

"Certainly, if you reflect on the impact the global financial crisis had on the way that ordinary Australians feel about the superannuation fund industry."

ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos acknowledged Henry's concerns.

"Yes, we have seen public sentiment reduce and from an ASFA point of view our core strategies are around the confidence in the industry," she said.

Vamos pointed out the association had launched guidelines to measuring risk in portfolios, based on the number of negative annual returns over a 20 year period.

But she said further work had to be done to make the measurements consumer-friendly.

"The next step is: What is the consumer equivalent? Because one in 20 [years] is not a great measure for consumers," she said.