Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
29 August 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Investors drawn to private markets for genuine ESG exposure, says manager

Federation Asset Management has experienced growing interest from investors seeking to invest responsibly through private market opportunities
icon

Manager overhauls tech ETF to target Nasdaq’s top players

BlackRock is repositioning its iShares Future Tech Innovators ETF to focus on the top 30 Nasdaq non-financial firms, ...

icon

Dixon Advisory inquiry no longer going ahead as Senate committee opts out

The inquiry into collapsed financial services firm Dixon Advisory will no longer go ahead, with the Senate economics ...

icon

Latest performance test results prompt further calls for test overhaul

APRA’s latest superannuation performance test results raise critical questions around how effective the test currently ...

icon

HESTA, ART to challenge ATO’s position on imputation credits in Federal Court

Industry fund HESTA has filed an appeal against an ATO decision on tax offsets from franking credits, with the ...

icon

Net flows, Altius acquisition push Australian Ethical FUM to record high

The ethical investment manager has reported record funds under management of $13.94 billion following positive net ...

VIEW ALL

Cormann questions intra-fund advice

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

PJC member Mathias Cormann has questioned why all super members should pay for intra-fund advice services.

Opposition assistant treasury spokesman Mathias Cormann has questioned whether intra-fund advice is consistent with the objective of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms.

Cormann, who is a member of the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) on Corporations and Financial Services, questioned why under intra-fund advice super fund members had to pay for this service, even though they might not access it.

"I thought FOFA was about increasing transparency and making sure that people receive the advice they pay for," Cormann said during yesterday's PJC hearing on the FOFA reforms.

"A lot of people will pay for advice they won't access.

"One hundred per cent of members will pay for advice that will be accessed by 3-10 per cent of members. How is that consistent with FOFA?"

The question was put to Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia chief executive Pauline Vamos.

Vamos argued that where a compulsory system required people to contribute money to a fund, they were entitled to ask questions about their interest in the fund.

"Where you have a compulsory system ... there is the moral and social obligation to ensure that when they want advice about their interest in that fund they can access it," she said.

She also argued that it was a relative small cost of the overall operational costs of a fund due to the scale of the funds and the nature of the advice.

"When you look at the total operating cost of the fund, 40 per cent of the operating amounts are administration, 17 per cent of that 40 per cent goes to financial planning and 23 per cent goes to providing call centres. The majority of call centres provide general advice," she said.

"You will have with any superannuation fund service, whether it is administration, the call centre, practical advice or access to the website, you will always have services provided that everybody pays for that not everybody takes up."

After a question from PJC chairman Bernie Ripoll, Industry Super Network chief executive David Whiteley also pointed out that intra-fund advice was available to both retail and industry funds, thereby not favouring any industry.

"It is available to all funds, not just industry funds," he said.

Whiteley said a number of retail funds were already providing services that could be labelled intra-fund, or simple, advice, including Mercer and ANZ.