Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for FY2024–25, driven by a recovery in ...
icon

Markets climb 'wall of worry' to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

icon

ASIC levy for investment and super sector set to rise 9%

The corporate regulator has released its estimated industry levies for FY2024–25, with the cost for the investment ...

icon

Diversified portfolios deliver for industry funds as markets flourish

Another strong year for equities, both domestic and global, has driven largely positive returns for these industry super ...

icon

VanEck warns of looming US asset unwind as key risk signals flash red

VanEck has signalled an impending major unwinding in US assets, after issuing a warning that the world is largely ...

icon

Metrics makes 2 acquisitions ahead of consumer lending expansion

Metrics Credit Partners has completed the acquisition of Taurus Financial Group and BC Investment Group as it looks to ...

VIEW ALL

Cormann questions intra-fund advice

  •  
By
  •  
3 minute read

PJC member Mathias Cormann has questioned why all super members should pay for intra-fund advice services.

Opposition assistant treasury spokesman Mathias Cormann has questioned whether intra-fund advice is consistent with the objective of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms.

Cormann, who is a member of the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) on Corporations and Financial Services, questioned why under intra-fund advice super fund members had to pay for this service, even though they might not access it.

"I thought FOFA was about increasing transparency and making sure that people receive the advice they pay for," Cormann said during yesterday's PJC hearing on the FOFA reforms.

"A lot of people will pay for advice they won't access.

"One hundred per cent of members will pay for advice that will be accessed by 3-10 per cent of members. How is that consistent with FOFA?"

The question was put to Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia chief executive Pauline Vamos.

Vamos argued that where a compulsory system required people to contribute money to a fund, they were entitled to ask questions about their interest in the fund.

"Where you have a compulsory system ... there is the moral and social obligation to ensure that when they want advice about their interest in that fund they can access it," she said.

She also argued that it was a relative small cost of the overall operational costs of a fund due to the scale of the funds and the nature of the advice.

"When you look at the total operating cost of the fund, 40 per cent of the operating amounts are administration, 17 per cent of that 40 per cent goes to financial planning and 23 per cent goes to providing call centres. The majority of call centres provide general advice," she said.

"You will have with any superannuation fund service, whether it is administration, the call centre, practical advice or access to the website, you will always have services provided that everybody pays for that not everybody takes up."

After a question from PJC chairman Bernie Ripoll, Industry Super Network chief executive David Whiteley also pointed out that intra-fund advice was available to both retail and industry funds, thereby not favouring any industry.

"It is available to all funds, not just industry funds," he said.

Whiteley said a number of retail funds were already providing services that could be labelled intra-fund, or simple, advice, including Mercer and ANZ.