Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several ...
icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

VIEW ALL

ASIC bans Citibank manager for life

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

ASIC has banned a former Citibank relationship manager.

ASIC has permanently banned a former Citibank relationship manager from providing financial services after she conducted 31 transactions without client authorisation.

Victoria Cai worked for Citibank between 2006 and 2010 and was responsible for facilitating investment instructions made by clients, particularly foreign exchange trades.

Cai conducted transactions between client accounts without client authorisation or knowledge and submitted transfer application forms containing falsified signatures.

On one occasion, Cai cancelled a client's term deposit to facilitate one of these transactions.

 
 

ASIC also found she altered the frequency at which client account statements were received and suppressed some statements completely so clients had no knowledge of the transactions.

The corporate regulator also found instances where Cai provided clients with statements containing fictitious account balances.

Cai transferred US$527,900 to her personal accounts from a client account, including $170,000 to facilitate payments to her own mortgage.

The affected clients have been reimbursed by Citibank and ASIC acknowledged the assistance of Citibank in this matter.

Cai has the right to appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review of ASIC's decision.