Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several ...
icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

VIEW ALL

AIST flags concerns over opt-in

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

AIST wants broader application of opt-in.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has expressed concerns over the  opt-in legislation as proposed in the first tranche of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms.

AIST said in a submission to Treasury today that it strongly supports the intent of proposed FOFA reforms, but said it had concerns with how the new rules primarily apply to new clients under the opt-in proposal.

The draft legislation for the proposed opt-in requirements now only applies to new clients and the definition is very broad and open to abuse, AIST said.

AIST would like to see the opt-in requirement applied to all clients receiving ongoing advice.

 
 

However, based on the legislation at hand we recommend the exclusion be applied only to those clients who actually received personal advice.

"This is a critical package of reforms that we have to get right - not only to protect consumers, but to generate greater trust and professionalism across the financial advisory industry," AIST policy and research manager Tom Garcia said.

The institute also said a fee disclosure statement should be provided to all clients on an annual basis in addition and regardless of any opt-in requirements and argued for a renewal notice to be provided to all clients who are part of a client book that has been sold to another provider.

The institute recommended that 'best interests obligations' should be principles based as a more prescriptive approach, such as a checklist for advice, could create loopholes or a situation where the checklist is used as template for advice.

AIST said the draft legislation was also too vague on the application of scaled advice.

It also said ASIC should have increased auditing capabilities in addition to its extended licensing and banning powers.