Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
07 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Fund managers warn of ‘low to no returns’ as US fiscal risks mount

The US has long been seen as an economic powerhouse benefiting from low borrowing costs and strong growth, but with the passage of the so-called “One ...
icon

Finalists for the Australian Wealth Management Awards revealed

The finalists for the Australian Wealth Management Awards 2025 have been revealed, shining a spotlight on the top ...

icon

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment ...

icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

VIEW ALL

MySuper will not dictate fees: Cooper

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Jeremy Cooper has ended speculation about maximum fee levels for MySuper options.

Former Super System Review chair Jeremy Cooper has rejected the idea that a MySuper regime will set legal requirements around maximum fee levels for the default fund.

"There is absolutely no limitation whatsoever on two important things: investment strategies or fees," Cooper said at the Morningstar Investment Conference last week.

"There have been an awful lot of furphies floating around in the market around those two issues. There is absolutely nothing preventing a MySuper fund charging whatever it likes."

He also denied the government would push for funds to include more passive investment strategies.

 
 

"Similarly, the government would be brain dead if it tried to dictate to all the managers, with their consultants, what the strategy ought to be in the MySuper fund, so there is no dictum that it needs to be a passive investment. So those are total furphies," he said.

A number of small to mid-sized industry funds use only active fund managers in their investment options, and they feared they would have to change their strategy as a result of new legislation.

Asked if the MySuper regime would allow for 100 per cent active management, Cooper, who is currently Challenger retirement income chairman, said: "Legally, there is nothing that will prevent them from doing that, but they will just show up as a fund with high fees and [as a result] low returns."
 
As part of the Cooper review, Deloitte was asked to produce a series of estimates of the total costs of MySuper products for various sized funds.

The estimates show the total cost - including investment and operating costs, as well as costs associated with intra-fund advice - for an actively-managed balanced portfolio that includes alternative assets would be 89 basis points for a $5 billion super fund and about 77 basis points for a $10 billion fund.

Some industry participants have taken these calculations as a guideline to what the government will look for in issuing MySuper licences.

Suggestions have been made that First State Super's balanced fund, which charges an investment fee of 37 basis points for a person with an account balance of $50,000, was the model on which MySuper was built.

Cooper did not deny that was the case.

"First State Super is probably the most comfortable with MySuper," he said.