Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
09 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s governance and lending weight to ...
icon

Silver’s record performance riding ‘dual tailwinds’, Global X says

Silver ETFs are drawing record inflows, fuelled by strong industrial demand, gold’s upward momentum, and global interest ...

icon

Conaghan says Labor has retreated from ‘flawed’ super tax

The shadow financial services minister has confirmed Labor’s retreat from the proposed $3 million super tax, describing ...

icon

Ausbil backs active edge with new dividend ETF

The Australian fund manager Ausbil has launched an active ETF designed to provide investors with resilient income, ...

icon

Combet hails $27bn gain as portfolio shifts pay off

The Future Fund has posted a $27.4 billion increase in value to $252.3 billion, driven by strong equity markets, ...

icon

Global funds outperform as Australian equities lag benchmarks

Active fund managers in Australia face mixed fortunes as global equities and real estate outperform but domestic ...

VIEW ALL

Cooper panel rejected life-cycle options

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

The Cooper panel discarded life-cycle options when devising MySuper because the returns were too low.

The Super System Review panel did not include life-cycle options in MySuper because the investment returns of such vehicles were too low to provide an appropriate level of retirement savings.

The panel had asked actuaries to model the returns of a life-cycle fund that would automatically adjust the asset allocation of the fund to a gradually more conservative profile at certain intervals during the investment period, based on the age of the member.

"We asked them to model the lifestyle option, and it came in closer to conservative, but somewhere between conservative and balanced," former panel member Sandy Grant told the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia conference last week.

The reason life-cycle funds produced slightly better results than conservative funds was logical, Grant said.

 
 

"You've got your money at risk at the wrong time. When you've got bugger all in your account, you've got a high interest rate going. When you've got a sh*tload in your account, you've got bugger all interest. It is double bugger all," he said.

Russell Investments government and institutions managing director Geoff Peck agreed that from an investment perspective it made more sense to keep members in a traditional balanced fund until retirement, rather than mechanically adjusting allocations without regard for the underlying investment decisions.

However, Peck also said trustees should have a clear process for transitioning members from the accumulation phase to the retirement phase.

"How you engage with that transitioner actually has a fairly significant bearing on the way you should invest during that transition," he said.

"Without that a MySuper member might legitimately go back to the trustee saying: 'Well, you knew I was going to retire and, therefore, why didn't you act more conservatively with my investments in the lead up to that?' I think there is going to be an argument around these sorts of things."

But he also said the right way to reallocate assets depended much on the individual circumstances of the member.