Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
10 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns over cost-cutting, offshoring ...
icon

How $2.68tn is spread across products and investments

Australia’s $2.68 trillion superannuation system is being shaped not only by the dominance of MySuper and Choice ...

icon

Private credit growth triggers caution at Yarra Capital

As private credit emerges as a fast-growing asset class, Yarra Capital Management remains cautious about the risks that ...

icon

CBA flags end of global rate-cutting cycle

The major bank has indicated that central banks are nearing the end of their rate-cutting cycles, while Trump’s pressure ...

icon

ETF market nears $300bn as international equities lead inflows

The Australian ETF industry is on the cusp of hitting $300 billion in assets under management, with VanEck forecasting ...

icon

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s ...

VIEW ALL

Hostplus CIO calls for liquidity window

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Super funds should be allowed periods of lower liquidity levels to make better long-term investments, according to the Hostplus CIO.

Superannuation funds should be able to make use of a liquidity window to bridge short-term increases in illiquid holdings in order to make better investment decisions, according to Hostplus chief investment officer Sam Sicilia.

"It seems to me that superannuation funds are unnecessarily hamstrung in their ability to take on additional levels of illiquidity, especially given the fact that superannuation money is locked within in the superannuation system - members cannot take their money," Sicilia said yesterday at the annual Australian Super Investment Conference on the Gold Coast.

Sicilia argued that if super funds were to participate in attractive investment opportunities, such as Australian infrastructure projects and the expected offloading of assets by European governments, they should be allowed to increase their exposure to illiquid assets.

"The availability of a liquidity window would enable superannuation funds to invest over much longer time horizons," he said.
 
But super funds are restricted in their ability to offset illiquid holdings, partly because they need to hold cash to offset member investment choice liabilities.

 
 

"Conceptually, [a liquidity window] should permit member choice options, not just to be backed by cash, but also by future compulsory superannuation contributions, by rental income that comes from your direct property portfolio, by distribution income that comes from your infrastructure assets," he said.

"I can see absolutely no reason why we have to hold cash for member investment choice options. What we need to do is find mechanisms to transfer the value of the member's holdings in one option to another or between funds. It need not be cash, and a liquidity window would help offset that.

"I urge super funds to lobby for a liquidity window," he said.

But Australian Prudential Regulation Authority senior manager Kevin Dent, who also spoke at the conference, said there was no quick fix to liquidity issues and stressed the importance of scenario testing by funds.

"This is not an issue that you solve on a permanent basis. Funds need to constantly monitor their requirements," he said.