Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
17 July 2025 by Miranda Brownlee

Evergreen funds offer opportunities and trade-offs, warns consulting firm

Evergreen and semi-liquid fund structures have simplified access to private markets but their liquidity profile can pose potential risks, according to ...
icon

Resilient sharemarkets drive double-digit returns for super funds

Super funds have achieved strong returns over FY2024–25 despite recent trade tensions and concerns in the Middle East, ...

icon

Major bank stocks showing signs of ‘frothy valuations’: Morningstar

The majority of banks have run ahead of fundamentals with the Commonwealth Bank especially overvalued, Morningstar ...

icon

Why fund managers aren’t deterred by the recent tech pullback

Despite a slow start to 2025, experts say they’re optimistic about the sector’s long-term future – particularly ...

icon

La Trobe Financial announces new head of distribution

La Trobe Financial has appointed a new head of distribution across their asset management division, bolstering the ...

icon

Zenith and Lonsec lose senior staff to investment consultancy

Investment consultancy Ascalon Capital has looked to research houses for hires, appointing one each from Zenith ...

VIEW ALL

ASIC seeks to wind up possible Ponzi scheme

  •  
By
  •  
2 minute read

ASIC has appointed a liquidator to wind up 13 companies involved in a possible Ponzi scheme.

ASIC has obtained orders to wind up 13 companies that have been associated with the possible operation of a Ponzi-style scheme and has appointed Simon Wallace-Smith of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu as liquidator.

Wallace-Smith will be required to identify, collect and secure the assets of the companies for the benefit of investors and creditors.

The companies are associated with Peter van de Steeg, Jonathan Ezzy and Peter Berlowitz of Victoria and Scott Walker of Western Australia.

The scheme has affected more than 100 investors who have contributed in excess of $16 million.

 
 

In April this year ASIC sought to freeze the companies' assets, which were then still estimated at $14.6 million.

ASIC said it was concerned the defendants may have been providing or involved in conducting a financial services business without the necessary Australian financial services licence and without providing the required adequate disclosure to investors.

The regulator was also concerned investors may have been misled about the nature of the arrangements they were entering into and that the defendants may have breached various provisions of the Corporations Act.

ASIC continues to investigate the activities of the defendants.