lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
07 November 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Macquarie profit rises amid stronger asset management results

Macquarie Group has posted a modest profit rise for the first half, supported by stronger earnings across its asset management and banking divisions
icon

ESG investing proves resilient amid global uncertainty

Despite global ESG adoption dipping slightly from record highs, Asia Pacific investors remain deeply committed to ...

icon

Cboe licence attractive to potential buyers: ASIC

Cboe’s recent success in acquiring a market operation license will make the exchange more attractive to incoming buyers, ...

icon

NAB profit steady as margins tighten and costs rise

The major bank has posted a stable full-year profit as margin pressures and remediation costs offset strong lending and ...

icon

LGT heralds Aussie fixed income 'renaissance'

Despite the RBA’s cash rate hold, the domestic bond market is in good shape compared to its international counterparts, ...

icon

Stonepeak to launch ASX infrastructure debt note

Global alternative investment firm Stonepeak is breaking into Australia with the launch of an ASX-listed infrastructure ...

VIEW ALL

ASIC seeks to wind up possible Ponzi scheme

  •  
By
  •  
2 minute read

ASIC has appointed a liquidator to wind up 13 companies involved in a possible Ponzi scheme.

ASIC has obtained orders to wind up 13 companies that have been associated with the possible operation of a Ponzi-style scheme and has appointed Simon Wallace-Smith of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu as liquidator.

Wallace-Smith will be required to identify, collect and secure the assets of the companies for the benefit of investors and creditors.

The companies are associated with Peter van de Steeg, Jonathan Ezzy and Peter Berlowitz of Victoria and Scott Walker of Western Australia.

The scheme has affected more than 100 investors who have contributed in excess of $16 million.

 
 

In April this year ASIC sought to freeze the companies' assets, which were then still estimated at $14.6 million.

ASIC said it was concerned the defendants may have been providing or involved in conducting a financial services business without the necessary Australian financial services licence and without providing the required adequate disclosure to investors.

The regulator was also concerned investors may have been misled about the nature of the arrangements they were entering into and that the defendants may have breached various provisions of the Corporations Act.

ASIC continues to investigate the activities of the defendants.