Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

Ipac parts with four fund managers

  •  
By
  •  
5 minute read

Ipac farewells four managers and hires two new ones for its Australian equity funds.

Ipac Investment Services has terminated the mandates of four fund managers after it concluded a review of its $4 billion Pathways multi-manager Australian equity portfolios.

Ipac ended relationships with Integrity Investment Management, Maple-Brown Abbott, MIR Investment Management and Wallara Asset Management in August and September this year.

The terminated mandates varied between $100 million and $600 million in size, Ipac chief investment officer Jeff Rogers told InvestorDaily.

The review also resulted in the hiring of two new fund managers, Lazard Asset Management and GMO, which brings the total number of managers to four.

 
 

Last year, Ipac still had seven managers but a mandate with Challenger was ended in April this year.

"If you think about lessons learned from last year ... the push away from complexity will certainly be one of the trends over the next few years in financial markets," Rogers said.

Ipac also avoids holding many of the same stocks through different managers, Rogers said.

"I don't think we are saying six managers is wrong, but we think we can get the bulk of that value and actually deliver a very good package to our clients without having all these overlapping positions," he said.

"We are building a portfolio using very high quality managers for specific tasks to meet our overall portfolio need."

Lazard and GMO have been explicitly asked to concentrate on the small and mid-sized companies, because Rogers feels this is where active management can perform better than the market.

Although small and mid-sized companies require more research and, therefore, is a more expensive sector to manage than large companies, Ipac has balanced costs out by asking Lazard and GMO to hold the 15 largest companies close to index weighting and will not pay them for this.

"The average cost is actually lower, because we don't pay them for larger stocks," Rogers said.

The reshuffling of the portfolio does not mean there is more money allocated to small and mid-sized companies, but only that the larger stocks will be less actively managed and held closer to their index weighting.

"What you are finding, especially in the large cap names, is unnecessary turnover," Rogers said.

Schroders and Barclays Global Investors have been retained as managers and they will actively manage large company holdings.