Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
08 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

No rate cut in July, but Bullock says call was about timing rather than direction

In a sharp rebuke to market expectations, the Reserve Bank held the cash rate steady at 3.85 per cent on Tuesday, defying near-unanimous forecasts of ...
icon

Platforms hold their ground with fund managers amid advice shift

Fund managers are keeping platforms firmly in their ETFs, confident in their growing role reshaping financial advice and ...

icon

‘Set-and-forget portfolios no longer serve’, says BlackRock as it adopts tactical stance

Immutable economic laws and mega forces are keeping BlackRock overweight US equities, but the fund manager is adopting a ...

icon

New active ETF provider aims to be ‘new Betashares’ with active ETFs

A specialist active ETF provider believes it has what it takes to become “the new Betashares”. Savana Asset ...

icon

RBA delivers closely watched decision amid mounting easing signals

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call

icon

DigitalX secures institutional backing as bitcoin strategy gains momentum

DigitalX’s latest strategic placement signals strong institutional endorsement of its cryptocurrency strategy by leaders ...

VIEW ALL

Short-selling ban cost hundreds of millions

  •  
By
  •  
4 minute read

The short-selling ban has cost the financial services industry more than $300 million, according to a fund manager.

The cost associated with the short-selling ban is likely to be more than $300 million, according to fund manager Plato Investment Management.

The restrictions reduced trading volumes and led to higher transaction costs, Plato Investment Management managing director Don Hamson said in a report that was sent to ASIC and Treasury before the ban was lifted on 25 May.

Reduced trading volumes resulted in fewer commissions for brokers, while an increase in bid/ask spreads led to higher transaction costs, he said.

Based on a brokerage commission of 10 basis points and an increase in spreads by 8 basis points, the ban would have resulted in $1 billion in missed revenues on an annualised basis.

 
 

"You can always argue that the brokerage commission should be higher or lower, but I think it is a reasonable estimate," Hamson told InvestorDaily.

But the short-selling ban was only fully in place for two months, not 12 months, while financial securities could not be sold short for another six months.

Assuming financials take up around 30 per cent of the market, the cost of the ban over the period it was in place amounted to $315 million.

Hamson said the real cost of the ban is likely to be higher because his calculations do not take into account the effect it had on the economy.

"The economic cost of banning short selling is likely to have further fuelled the already deteriorating economic and financial environment," he said.

Plato manages several funds that use short-selling strategies.