lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
07 November 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Macquarie profit rises amid stronger asset management results

Macquarie Group has posted a modest profit rise for the first half, supported by stronger earnings across its asset management and banking divisions
icon

ESG investing proves resilient amid global uncertainty

Despite global ESG adoption dipping slightly from record highs, Asia Pacific investors remain deeply committed to ...

icon

Cboe licence attractive to potential buyers: ASIC

Cboe’s recent success in acquiring a market operation license will make the exchange more attractive to incoming buyers, ...

icon

NAB profit steady as margins tighten and costs rise

The major bank has posted a stable full-year profit as margin pressures and remediation costs offset strong lending and ...

icon

LGT heralds Aussie fixed income 'renaissance'

Despite the RBA’s cash rate hold, the domestic bond market is in good shape compared to its international counterparts, ...

icon

Stonepeak to launch ASX infrastructure debt note

Global alternative investment firm Stonepeak is breaking into Australia with the launch of an ASX-listed infrastructure ...

VIEW ALL

Derivatives licence inappropriate

  •  
By Karin Derkley
  •  
2 minute read

Concerns have emerged regarding new proposed rules on the derivatives licensing of advisers and instalment warrants.

Proposed new rules that require advisers to have a derivatives licence in order to advise on instalment warrants used to buy property within self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) have been greeted with concern by some in the SMSF industry.

Multiport technical services director Phil La Greca said while he agrees with the proposal to regard an instalment warrant used to borrow within super as a financial product, it was not beneficial to regard it as a derivative product.

"A derivative takes its value from an underlying asset, which may be relevant in the case of a share warrant, but is not really the case when you are talking about an instalment warrant over, say, a residential property," he said.

It was probably more appropriate to compare this kind of instalment warrant to a margin loan than a derivative, La Greca added.

"The important issues here are the borrowing arrangements, ensuring the facility is set up correctly and ensuring the client can properly service the loan."

Advising on derivatives requires a completely different skill set to advising on super borrowings, DBA Lawyers senior associate Bryce Figot said.

In order to advise on super borrowings, advisers need a strong understanding of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 - including the implications of trustees being required to hold the property in an appointed trust, he said.

"If people don't understand how this works they could, for instance, end up having to pay stamp duty three times - when they buy a property in their name, when they transfer it into the trust and then when they transfer it back into their own names further down the track."

Figot believes that rather than holding a derivatives licence, those advising on super borrowings should hold a RGS146 licence with an SMSF component, as proposed by the Cooper review.

"What they need is SMSF-specific knowledge, rather than knowledge about derivatives," he said.

La Greca said few SMSF advisers currently hold derivative licences, and applying for one requires advisers to show proof that they have expertise in this area.

"Given that super borrowings have only been around since 2007, there's not likely to be many that can do that."