Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
10 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns over cost-cutting, offshoring ...
icon

How $2.68tn is spread across products and investments

Australia’s $2.68 trillion superannuation system is being shaped not only by the dominance of MySuper and Choice ...

icon

Private credit growth triggers caution at Yarra Capital

As private credit emerges as a fast-growing asset class, Yarra Capital Management remains cautious about the risks that ...

icon

CBA flags end of global rate-cutting cycle

The major bank has indicated that central banks are nearing the end of their rate-cutting cycles, while Trump’s pressure ...

icon

ETF market nears $300bn as international equities lead inflows

The Australian ETF industry is on the cusp of hitting $300 billion in assets under management, with VanEck forecasting ...

icon

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s ...

VIEW ALL

Derivatives licence inappropriate

  •  
By Karin Derkley
  •  
3 minute read

Concerns have emerged regarding new proposed rules on the derivatives licensing of advisers and instalment warrants.

Proposed new rules that require advisers to have a derivatives licence in order to advise on instalment warrants used to buy property within self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) have been greeted with concern by some in the SMSF industry.

Multiport technical services director Phil La Greca said while he agrees with the proposal to regard an instalment warrant used to borrow within super as a financial product, it was not beneficial to regard it as a derivative product.

"A derivative takes its value from an underlying asset, which may be relevant in the case of a share warrant, but is not really the case when you are talking about an instalment warrant over, say, a residential property," he said.

It was probably more appropriate to compare this kind of instalment warrant to a margin loan than a derivative, La Greca added.

"The important issues here are the borrowing arrangements, ensuring the facility is set up correctly and ensuring the client can properly service the loan."

Advising on derivatives requires a completely different skill set to advising on super borrowings, DBA Lawyers senior associate Bryce Figot said.

In order to advise on super borrowings, advisers need a strong understanding of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 - including the implications of trustees being required to hold the property in an appointed trust, he said.

"If people don't understand how this works they could, for instance, end up having to pay stamp duty three times - when they buy a property in their name, when they transfer it into the trust and then when they transfer it back into their own names further down the track."

Figot believes that rather than holding a derivatives licence, those advising on super borrowings should hold a RGS146 licence with an SMSF component, as proposed by the Cooper review.

"What they need is SMSF-specific knowledge, rather than knowledge about derivatives," he said.

La Greca said few SMSF advisers currently hold derivative licences, and applying for one requires advisers to show proof that they have expertise in this area.

"Given that super borrowings have only been around since 2007, there's not likely to be many that can do that."