Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
18 July 2025 by InvestorDaily team

Smaller super players stand out on top 10 ranking

SuperRatings has shared the top 10 balanced options of the last financial year. The Raiz Super Moderately Aggressive options was the top-performing ...
icon

Evergreen funds offer opportunities and trade-offs, warns consulting firm

Evergreen and semi-liquid fund structures have simplified access to private markets but their liquidity profile can pose ...

icon

Resilient sharemarkets drive double-digit returns for super funds

Super funds have achieved strong returns over FY2024–25 despite recent trade tensions and concerns in the Middle East, ...

icon

Major bank stocks showing signs of ‘frothy valuations’: Morningstar

The majority of banks have run ahead of fundamentals with the Commonwealth Bank especially overvalued, Morningstar ...

icon

Why fund managers aren’t deterred by the recent tech pullback

Despite a slow start to 2025, experts say they’re optimistic about the sector’s long-term future – particularly ...

icon

La Trobe Financial announces new head of distribution

La Trobe Financial has appointed a new head of distribution across their asset management division, bolstering the ...

VIEW ALL

SMSF trustee imprisoned

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

An illegal early-release superannuation scheme lands a SMSF trustee in jail.

A trustee of a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) has been sentenced to 12 months jail following ASIC charges regarding an early release superannuation scheme.

ASIC had brought charges against Susan Palusi for illegally facilitating the release of superannuation benefits totalling just over $260,000.

She was a trustee of the Palusi Superannuation Fund (PSF) at the time and dishonestly arranged nine people in the fund to get early access to their superannuation benefits, which were subsequently rolled into the PSF.

Palusi gave the money to a number of people while retaining around $73,000 by way of a commission.

 
 

According to ASIC, Palusi was aware of her legal obligations including the need to preserve superannuation benefits.

She was convicted under sections 62 and 202 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act (1993).

Under this Act, the sole purpose test requires SMSF trustees to maintain these funds for the purpose of providing retirement benefits to members.

Palusi was sentenced in the District Court of New South Wales.