Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
10 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns over cost-cutting, offshoring ...
icon

How $2.68tn is spread across products and investments

Australia’s $2.68 trillion superannuation system is being shaped not only by the dominance of MySuper and Choice ...

icon

Private credit growth triggers caution at Yarra Capital

As private credit emerges as a fast-growing asset class, Yarra Capital Management remains cautious about the risks that ...

icon

CBA flags end of global rate-cutting cycle

The major bank has indicated that central banks are nearing the end of their rate-cutting cycles, while Trump’s pressure ...

icon

ETF market nears $300bn as international equities lead inflows

The Australian ETF industry is on the cusp of hitting $300 billion in assets under management, with VanEck forecasting ...

icon

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s ...

VIEW ALL

SMSF trustee imprisoned

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
2 minute read

An illegal early-release superannuation scheme lands a SMSF trustee in jail.

A trustee of a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) has been sentenced to 12 months jail following ASIC charges regarding an early release superannuation scheme.

ASIC had brought charges against Susan Palusi for illegally facilitating the release of superannuation benefits totalling just over $260,000.

She was a trustee of the Palusi Superannuation Fund (PSF) at the time and dishonestly arranged nine people in the fund to get early access to their superannuation benefits, which were subsequently rolled into the PSF.

Palusi gave the money to a number of people while retaining around $73,000 by way of a commission.

 
 

According to ASIC, Palusi was aware of her legal obligations including the need to preserve superannuation benefits.

She was convicted under sections 62 and 202 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act (1993).

Under this Act, the sole purpose test requires SMSF trustees to maintain these funds for the purpose of providing retirement benefits to members.

Palusi was sentenced in the District Court of New South Wales.