Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
News
15 July 2025 by Miranda Brownlee

HUB24 solidifies position as market leader with record net inflows

Record net inflows of $19.8 billion over the financial year has further strengthened HUB24’s position in the platform space. Wealth platform HUB24 ...
icon

Australia’s productivity future hinges on super, ASFA warns

Australia’s superannuation system is doing more than funding retirements – it’s quietly fuelling the nation’s ...

icon

Fund managers’ Europe bet shaken by Trump’s fresh tariff threat

Fund managers who had been pinning their hopes on Europe as a relative safe haven from trade tensions are facing fresh ...

icon

T. Rowe Price raises risk profile amid global growth support

T. Rowe Price has modestly increased its risk appetite, upgrading its overall risk profile towards neutral as it seeks ...

icon

Betashares targets top spot with managed accounts merger

Betashares will merge its managed accounts business with Sydney-based InvestSense to create Trellia Wealth Partners, an ...

icon

Unpredictable markets spur ‘significant shift’ to active management: Invesco

Index concentration risk along with macro and political volatility has prompted many sovereign wealth funds to turn to ...

VIEW ALL

IFSA warns on Henry annuity option

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

The Henry review's proposed government annuity scheme will disadvantage the poor and could even breach the Australian constitution, warns IFSA.

A mandated government annuities system will punish low-income earners, according to the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA).

According to IFSA, in its interim report, the Henry review examined the possibility of a compulsory government annuities scheme.

Research commissioned for IFSA, however, showed that such a scheme would favour wealthier people at the expense of lower income earners, IFSA chief executive John Brogden said.

"Such a scheme would be manifestly unfair and result in lower paid workers subsidising wealthier Australians," Brogden said.

 
 

"According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, manual labourers do not live as long as office workers. A government-run annuities scheme, by its nature, rewards those who live longer at the expense of those who have a shorter life."

He said a government scheme would also discourage people from voluntarily adding to their retirement savings because of the "harsh restrictions imposed on how savings can be accessed in retirement".

A mandated scheme may also deny people the choice of wanting an annuity product.

Brodgen also said the scheme "forces people to fund a scheme that may not be on just terms and could be in breach of the Australian constitution".

Brogden said people should have the right to choose how to manage their retirement savings.