Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
11 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

No bear market in sight for Aussie shares but banks face rotation risk

Australian equities are defying expectations, with resilient earnings, policy support and a shift away from bank dominance fuelling confidence that ...
icon

US funds drive steep outflows at GQG Partners

Outflows of US$1.4 billion from its US equity funds have contributed to GQG Partners reporting its highest monthly ...

icon

Super funds’ hedge moves point to early upside risk for AUD

Australian superannuation funds have slightly lifted their hedge ratios on international equities, reversing a ...

icon

Australia’s super giant goes big on impact: $2bn and counting

Australia’s second largest super fund is prioritising impact investing with a $2 billion commitment, targeting assets ...

icon

Over half of Australian funds have closed in 15 years, A-REITs hit hardest

Over half of Australian investment funds available 15 years ago have either merged or closed, with Australian equity ...

icon

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns ...

VIEW ALL

IFSA warns on Henry annuity option

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

The Henry review's proposed government annuity scheme will disadvantage the poor and could even breach the Australian constitution, warns IFSA.

A mandated government annuities system will punish low-income earners, according to the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA).

According to IFSA, in its interim report, the Henry review examined the possibility of a compulsory government annuities scheme.

Research commissioned for IFSA, however, showed that such a scheme would favour wealthier people at the expense of lower income earners, IFSA chief executive John Brogden said.

"Such a scheme would be manifestly unfair and result in lower paid workers subsidising wealthier Australians," Brogden said.

 
 

"According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, manual labourers do not live as long as office workers. A government-run annuities scheme, by its nature, rewards those who live longer at the expense of those who have a shorter life."

He said a government scheme would also discourage people from voluntarily adding to their retirement savings because of the "harsh restrictions imposed on how savings can be accessed in retirement".

A mandated scheme may also deny people the choice of wanting an annuity product.

Brodgen also said the scheme "forces people to fund a scheme that may not be on just terms and could be in breach of the Australian constitution".

Brogden said people should have the right to choose how to manage their retirement savings.