Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
12 September 2025 by Georgie Preston

Royalties deliver on diversification but scalability remains uncertain

As royalties investing reaches record highs overseas, market experts in Australia are divided on its potential. With Wall Street pouring billions ...
icon

Brighter Super scales membership through mergers and successor fund transfers

Brighter Super has expanded its footprint in the superannuation sector through a combination of mergers and successor ...

icon

Rising costs and data centres cast doubt on AI returns

Artificial intelligence continues to reshape global markets, driving significant investment flows while leaving tangible ...

icon

ART, UniSuper and Aware Super secure gold amid sector challenges

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how ...

icon

APAC family offices lean defensively in portfolio construction with higher cash allocations

Family offices in the Asia-Pacific have maintained higher cash levels than regional contemporaries, while global ...

icon

No bear market in sight for Aussie shares but banks face rotation risk

Australian equities are defying expectations, with resilient earnings, policy support and a shift away from bank ...

VIEW ALL

ASX monopoly debate reignited

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
5 minute read

The federal government should grant licences to allow more market operators to compete with the ASX.

Australia should have access to multiple stock market operators, according to Instinet Pacific Services managing director John Fildes.

Australian investors are missing out on product innovation and efficiency because the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) is the sole market exchange.

Research from the firm showed multilateral trading facilities (MTF) operating in European markets had delivered cost savings for investors.  

Instinet's MTF saved its clients 5.08 basis points in management fees.

 
 

In November 2007, the European Union through its Markets in Financial Instruments Directive allowed MTFs to operate in conjunction with other European exchanges in a bid to promote competition.

Fildes said the Australian government should also consider other exchanges to operate in competition with the ASX.

The firm's sister company, Chi-X, has plans to enter the Australian market and compete with the ASX, however, the government is still considering the granting of licences.

It follows similar moves by other global exchange traders, including AXE and Liquidnet.

Liquidnet is already established in Australia, however, it only directs trades through the ASX, setting it apart from AXE and Chi-X, which intend to compete directly with the ASX.

"Competition allows for greater liquidity and product innovation in a market, which ultimately leads to lower costs for investors," Fildes said.

"The ASX is an archaic inefficient platform with rules that have been established two centuries ago. The Australian government has effectively allowed for a statutory monopoly to operate."

In September, Financial Services Minister Chris Bowen announced that market supervision powers under the ASX would move under the control of ASIC.

The move came in part because the government felt it could oversee the regulation of the ASX, thereby allowing competitors of the ASX to enter the market.

"We do have a number of applications before us for competition to the stock exchange [ASX] and it would not be possible to consider those on their merits while you have the ASX doing its own supervision," Bowen said at the time.

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) supports the move for greater competition in market services.

"The existence of regulated alternative trading and reporting platforms will allow market participants to effect trades in a more efficient and effective manner," IFSA deputy chief executive John O'Shaughnessy said.