Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

ASX monopoly debate reignited

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
5 minute read

The federal government should grant licences to allow more market operators to compete with the ASX.

Australia should have access to multiple stock market operators, according to Instinet Pacific Services managing director John Fildes.

Australian investors are missing out on product innovation and efficiency because the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) is the sole market exchange.

Research from the firm showed multilateral trading facilities (MTF) operating in European markets had delivered cost savings for investors.  

Instinet's MTF saved its clients 5.08 basis points in management fees.

 
 

In November 2007, the European Union through its Markets in Financial Instruments Directive allowed MTFs to operate in conjunction with other European exchanges in a bid to promote competition.

Fildes said the Australian government should also consider other exchanges to operate in competition with the ASX.

The firm's sister company, Chi-X, has plans to enter the Australian market and compete with the ASX, however, the government is still considering the granting of licences.

It follows similar moves by other global exchange traders, including AXE and Liquidnet.

Liquidnet is already established in Australia, however, it only directs trades through the ASX, setting it apart from AXE and Chi-X, which intend to compete directly with the ASX.

"Competition allows for greater liquidity and product innovation in a market, which ultimately leads to lower costs for investors," Fildes said.

"The ASX is an archaic inefficient platform with rules that have been established two centuries ago. The Australian government has effectively allowed for a statutory monopoly to operate."

In September, Financial Services Minister Chris Bowen announced that market supervision powers under the ASX would move under the control of ASIC.

The move came in part because the government felt it could oversee the regulation of the ASX, thereby allowing competitors of the ASX to enter the market.

"We do have a number of applications before us for competition to the stock exchange [ASX] and it would not be possible to consider those on their merits while you have the ASX doing its own supervision," Bowen said at the time.

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) supports the move for greater competition in market services.

"The existence of regulated alternative trading and reporting platforms will allow market participants to effect trades in a more efficient and effective manner," IFSA deputy chief executive John O'Shaughnessy said.