Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

Aggressive default options needed for women

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

Women need to look at default options in superannuation funds that offer more aggressive investment strategies in order to tackle gender inequality in super.

Women need to adopt an aggressive investment strategy if they are to address gender inequity in superannuation, according to a superannuation expert.

"Women's careers are characterised by a broken employment pattern. Women also get paid on average less than men. This puts them at a significant disadvantage in retirement," Queensland University of Technology finance researcher Anup Basu said.

Basu said the current one-size-fits-all default investment options in superannuation were conservative and would not address the retirement shortfall for women.

"By adopting aggressive investment strategies, women give themselves a better chance of keeping up with their male counterparts in terms of retirement wealth," he said.

 
 

The research, which Basu undertook in partnership with Griffith University business professor Michael Drew, revealed that if women aged between 25 and 30 took a five-year career break, the disparity in retirement savings between men and women was about $300,000.

Given the average default fund of a superannuation fund had a 60 per cent allocation to shares, the research found default options should be tailored to gender needs.

For example, women on a five-year career break can adopt a slightly more aggressive approach and invest up to 80 per cent in the local share market. 

"Women would only need to contribute an extra 3 per cent to their superannuation in order to make up the retirement shortfall," Basu said.

In comparison, these women would be looking at an extra 6-7 per cent contribution to their superannuation if they adopted a conservative investment strategy.

While volatility is associated with aggressive investment strategies, Basu said the modelling proved otherwise.

"Contrary to expectations, our modelling showed that over very long-term investment horizons the risk of encountering extremely adverse outcomes by pursuing a more aggressive strategy was not much different from that by following a less aggressive one," he said.