Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
08 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

No rate cut in July, but Bullock says call was about timing rather than direction

In a sharp rebuke to market expectations, the Reserve Bank held the cash rate steady at 3.85 per cent on Tuesday, defying near-unanimous forecasts of ...
icon

Platforms hold their ground with fund managers amid advice shift

Fund managers are keeping platforms firmly in their ETFs, confident in their growing role reshaping financial advice and ...

icon

‘Set-and-forget portfolios no longer serve’, says BlackRock as it adopts tactical stance

Immutable economic laws and mega forces are keeping BlackRock overweight US equities, but the fund manager is adopting a ...

icon

New active ETF provider aims to be ‘new Betashares’ with active ETFs

A specialist active ETF provider believes it has what it takes to become “the new Betashares”. Savana Asset ...

icon

RBA delivers closely watched decision amid mounting easing signals

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call

icon

DigitalX secures institutional backing as bitcoin strategy gains momentum

DigitalX’s latest strategic placement signals strong institutional endorsement of its cryptocurrency strategy by leaders ...

VIEW ALL

Macquarie, BT Wrap most expensive: survey

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

A customised survey of a select group of wraps, discount brokers and online platforms compared the cost of fees, minimum investments and platform administration.

Macquarie and BT were the most expensive wraps in terms of total cost to the investor over a five-year period, according to research from Investment Trends undertaken on behalf of RaboPlus.

The customised research compared platform fees on a $50,000 investment in 10 common investment funds over a one- to five-year period, as well as a blended model portfolio over a five-year period.

"We compared fees over a five-year time horizon because fund managers across most asset classes believe that investors should consider investing in these managed funds long term," Investment Trends researcher Andrew Knox said.

A select group of wraps including Colonial First Choice Wholesale, BT Wrap and Macquarie Wrap were included in the customised survey as well as discount brokers.

 
 

The research is the first of its kind and compares wraps, which are usually only accessible by financial planners, brokers and online platforms designed for direct brokers, according to RaboPlus.

The Macquarie and BT platforms were the most expensive based on an initial investment of $50,000.

Colonial First Choice Wholesale was not included in the comparison as only two common funds were represented on the platform.

"The BT and Macquarie wraps are only available through financial advisers. The fees, therefore, took into account a planner fee in addition to the administration fee," Knox said.

At the end of year five, RaboPlus charged the lowest fees for six out of the ten common managed funds.

Minimum investments to wholesale managed funds, platform administration, online tools and investor education were also compared in the survey.

RaboPlus also offered investors the lowest minimum investment into wholesale funds at $250 compared to all the other platforms.

E*Trade was the second lowest at $1000 and CommSec ranged from $1000 to $20,000. BT and Macquarie Wrap had the highest minimum investments at $50,000.

The research also showed RaboPlus and E*Trade were stronger in transaction and administration services, with Colonial First Choice Wholesale having the fastest application transaction times.