Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
08 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

No rate cut in July, but Bullock says call was about timing rather than direction

In a sharp rebuke to market expectations, the Reserve Bank held the cash rate steady at 3.85 per cent on Tuesday, defying near-unanimous forecasts of ...
icon

Platforms hold their ground with fund managers amid advice shift

Fund managers are keeping platforms firmly in their ETFs, confident in their growing role reshaping financial advice and ...

icon

‘Set-and-forget portfolios no longer serve’, says BlackRock as it adopts tactical stance

Immutable economic laws and mega forces are keeping BlackRock overweight US equities, but the fund manager is adopting a ...

icon

New active ETF provider aims to be ‘new Betashares’ with active ETFs

A specialist active ETF provider believes it has what it takes to become “the new Betashares”. Savana Asset ...

icon

RBA delivers closely watched decision amid mounting easing signals

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call

icon

DigitalX secures institutional backing as bitcoin strategy gains momentum

DigitalX’s latest strategic placement signals strong institutional endorsement of its cryptocurrency strategy by leaders ...

VIEW ALL

FPA slams AFA

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

The AFA is wrong on adviser remuneration and its position is nothing more than an attempt to recruit FPA members, the association says.

The Association of Financial Advisers' (AFA) call to financial planners to reject a move away from commissions was disappointing and short-sighted, FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said.

On Wednesday the AFA raised concerns about the FPA consultation paper, which outlined a transition by financial planners to a fee-for-service model.

AFA chief executive Richard Klipin said banning commissions takes away a consumer's fundamental right to choose, a right which has been enshrined in legislation since 2004.

"We are not banning commissions, rather encouraging our members to transition to fee-based remuneration models to protect the profession and consumers," Bloch said.

 
 

"The reality is that continuing to use a commission-based approach leaves planners open to accusations of conflict of interest and of lacking transparency."

Bloch also rejected the AFA's arguments that a fee-based approach would make financial advice unaffordable for many Australians.

"An asset-based fee, directed by the client, will ensure consumers can access affordable financial advice," Bloch said.

Bloch also slammed the AFA's claims that the FPA did not represent the interests of its members.

"The position adopted by the AFA is nothing more than an attempt to recruit FPA members and runs counter to the best interests of planners, clients and the wider community," Bloch said.

"It is a shame the AFA is trying to split the industry during a consultation period, through misleading statements designed to instil fear."