Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several ...
icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

VIEW ALL

Sovereign fund rules too opaque: Finsia

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
4 minute read

The Government has just added more complexity to a competitive funds management industry.

The Federal Government's heightened scrutiny of sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) could jeopardise the export viability of Australia's financial services sector, according to the Financial Services Institute of Australasia (Finsia).

On Monday, Treasurer Wayne Swan announced that the Government would apply six foreign investment guidelines to funds seeking investments in Australia.

According to the Treasurer, the principles would assess whether particular investments by these funds were consistent with Australia's national interest.

"We welcome the Treasurer's review into foreign investment. Guidelines that apply to the national interest, however, only make the rules opaque. We should be doing everything to encourage investment and this means improving transparency and accountability in doing business in Australia," Finsia chief executive Martin Fahy said.

 
 

Sovereign wealth funds represent a new form of global capital flows and are unlike traditional foreign investment, according to Fahy.

"These funds are passive investors that take a long-term view to investing in companies and therefore should be encouraged to invest in Australia," he said.

"One would assume that private equity funds should also be subjected to guidelines relating to Australia's national interest as was in the case over the deal with Qantas."

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA), however, believes that the real focus should be on amending certain takeover provisions for funds management.

"If we are to look at control tests, we should be looking at revising the 20 per cent takeover threshold. We are currently engaged in meaningful discussion about this with the Government," IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert said.

A sovereign wealth fund is a state owned fund composed of financial assets such as stocks, bonds, property or other financial instruments.