Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
05 September 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

APRA funds, party dissent behind Labor’s alleged Div 296 pause

APRA-regulated funds have reportedly raised concerns with the government over Division 296, as news of potential policy tweaks makes headlines
icon

Fed credibility erosion may propel gold above US$5k/oz, Goldman Sachs says

Goldman Sachs has warned threats to the Fed’s independence could lift gold above forecasts, shattering previous records

icon

Market pundits divided on availability of ‘reliable diversifiers’

While some believe reliable diversifiers are becoming increasingly rare, others disagree – citing several assets that ...

icon

AMP eyes portable alpha expansion as strategy makes quiet comeback

Portable alpha, long considered complex and costly, is experiencing a quiet resurgence as investors navigate ...

icon

Ten Cap remains bullish on equities as RBA eases policy

The investment management firm’s latest monthly update has cited rate cuts, labour strength and China’s recovery as key ...

icon

Super funds can handle tax tweaks, but not political meddling

The CEO of one of Australia’s largest super funds says his outfit has become an expert at rolling with regulatory ...

VIEW ALL

FPA concerned over ASIC action

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
3 minute read

The regulator's pursuit of the failed Westpoint Group does not go far enough, according to the FPA.

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) is concerned that ASIC's legal action against the promoters of Westpoint does not include unlicensed financial planners.

Yesterday the corporate watchdog announced that it would seek compensation for investors in the Westpoint Group. This included action against eight mezzanine companies and five licensed financial planning firms that sold Westpoint investments.

"We are concerned that ASIC will only take action against the directors of mezzanine companies and licensed financial planners," FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said.

"It seems only those covered by professional indemnity have been pursued yet there have been a number of unlicensed advisers that have sold Westpoint investments and yet have managed to escape the net."

 
 

According to the regulator, up to 85 per cent of investors in the failed group stand to benefit from the action.

The regulator will potentially seek up to $245 million in claims from the mezzanine companies and about $63.2 million in damages from the five licensees.

"Financial advisers have played and continue to play an important and valuable role for retail investors in relation to many complex products beyond just property. These proposed actions should be viewed in the context of the particular facts of Westpoint and how those products were sold," ASIC chair Tony D'Aloisio said.

Bloch said the FPA would be watching the legal process closely to determine whether its members remained compliant with the regulator's code of practice.