Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
04 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

From reflection to resilience: How AMP Super transformed its investment strategy

AMP’s strong 2024–25 returns were anything but a fluke – they were the product of a carefully recalibrated investment strategy that began several ...
icon

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their ...

icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

VIEW ALL

FPA concerned over ASIC action

  •  
By Christine St Anne
  •  
3 minute read

The regulator's pursuit of the failed Westpoint Group does not go far enough, according to the FPA.

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) is concerned that ASIC's legal action against the promoters of Westpoint does not include unlicensed financial planners.

Yesterday the corporate watchdog announced that it would seek compensation for investors in the Westpoint Group. This included action against eight mezzanine companies and five licensed financial planning firms that sold Westpoint investments.

"We are concerned that ASIC will only take action against the directors of mezzanine companies and licensed financial planners," FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said.

"It seems only those covered by professional indemnity have been pursued yet there have been a number of unlicensed advisers that have sold Westpoint investments and yet have managed to escape the net."

 
 

According to the regulator, up to 85 per cent of investors in the failed group stand to benefit from the action.

The regulator will potentially seek up to $245 million in claims from the mezzanine companies and about $63.2 million in damages from the five licensees.

"Financial advisers have played and continue to play an important and valuable role for retail investors in relation to many complex products beyond just property. These proposed actions should be viewed in the context of the particular facts of Westpoint and how those products were sold," ASIC chair Tony D'Aloisio said.

Bloch said the FPA would be watching the legal process closely to determine whether its members remained compliant with the regulator's code of practice.