Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Regulation
04 July 2025 by Keith Ford

Regulator investigating role of super trustees in Shield and First Guardian failures

ASIC is “considering what options” it has to hold super trustees to account for including the failed schemes on their platforms, according to its ...
icon

Magellan approaches $40bn, but performance fees decline

Magellan has closed out the financial year with funds under management of $39.6 billion. Over the last 12 months, ...

icon

RBA poised for another rate cut in July, but decision remains on a knife’s edge

Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting, ...

icon

Retail super funds deliver double-digit returns despite market turbulence

Retail superannuation funds Vanguard Super and Colonial First State have posted robust double-digit returns for ...

icon

Markets climb ‘wall of worry’ to fuel strong super returns, but can the rally last?

Australian super funds notched a third consecutive year of strong returns, with the median balanced option delivering an ...

icon

ASIC levy for investment and super sector set to rise 9%

The corporate regulator has released its estimated industry levies for FY2024–25, with the cost for the investment ...

VIEW ALL

Report exposes hedge fund myths

  •  
By Charlie Corbett
  •  
5 minute read

Hedge funds have come under fire from a leading investment bank.

Inconsistencies in hedge fund classification are causing widespread confusion and are preventing investors from truly diversifying their portfolios, according to a recent study.

The report by United States-based Bank of New York Mellon recommended hedge funds be classified using cluster analysis rather than by strategy.

Cluster analysis would group the funds, not by management style, but by observed behaviour.

"Traditional hedge fund indices are challenged by increasing demands to demonstrate transparency of the underlying funds and many hedge funds may change their strategy to maximise alpha," the report said.

 
 

"The resulting style drift is the cause of much difficulty in benchmarking and investor understanding."

Bank of New York Mellon managing director David Aldrich said recent volatility in equity markets was a real stress test for the hedge fund industry.

"Increased transparency of the underlying funds, and the use of cluster analysis for fund classification, will help identify a fund's true investment strategy and highlight any style drift, which collectively will improve investor confidence," Aldrich said.

The study, which was conducted in conjunction with research firm Oxford Metrica, looked at a universe of 5282 hedge funds.

It found there were three common myths that surround hedge funds.

It said the common perception that hedge funds were volatile was false.

"The analysis reported shows that most categories of style and strategy, on average, are less volatile than the equity markets," the report said.

The second myth was that all hedge funds generate pure alpha.

The study concluded, however, that despite the ubiquity of the absolute return epithet in the industry, hedge fund returns were increasingly beta driven.

The final myth challenged was that all hedge funds contribute little marginal risk to a core equity portfolio.

The report said, however, that because hedge fund returns converged with equity returns, investors were not getting true diversification.

"A major issue for the industry as a whole is to manage risk, return and correlation - alpha will need to be proven to justify the fee structure," the principal of the report's co-sponsor Oxford Metrica Rory Knight said.