Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Superannuation
11 July 2025 by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic

Beyond Silicon Valley: How super funds thrived on diversification in 2025

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley. In contrast to ...
icon

Netwealth edges in on rival HUB24 with record FUA net flows

The wealth management platform remains a strong performer in the platform space, generating a record $15.8 billion in ...

icon

South Korean exposure pays off as ASX-listed ETF jumps 32%

The iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (IKO) gained 32.1 per cent in the first six months of the year, marking South Korea’s ...

icon

Instos anticipate crypto to feature in traditional portfolios by 2030

Three-quarters of institutional investors believe cryptocurrencies will form part of traditional portfolio allocations ...

icon

US tipped to be ‘the big loser’ of Trump’s expanding trade war: AMP

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the ...

icon

Government cements RBA overhaul with new rules

The government has cemented its overhaul of the RBA’s governance with the release of an updated Statement on the Conduct ...

VIEW ALL

Investment fees reveal fund differences

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
5 minute read

Smaller super funds still offer cost-effective investment fees, according to legalsuper.

Bigger superannuation funds do not necessarily charge lower investment fees than smaller funds, according to legalsuper chief executive Andrew Proebstl.

"The crux of this issue is that you need to be a certain size to negotiate comparable investment fees. But our argument is that if that's the case, then you would expect that fees of bigger funds would be lower than smaller funds," Proebstl said.

"But if you look at the product disclosure statements (PDS) of different funds, that doesn't seem to be born out."

An analysis of some of the most recent industry fund PDS's shows the $1.2 billion legal industry fund had investment fees of 0.64 per cent.

 
 

This is compared to 0.86 per cent for the $7 billion Hostplus fund and 0.72 per cent for one of Australia's largest funds, AustralianSuper.

However, Deloitte partner Wayne Walker found a different result in recent research completed by the financial services firm.

"We looked at investment fees and we found that there are significant economies of scale. We also found that larger funds were delivering better returns on default options as well," Walker said.

AustralianSuper general manager of business development Paul Schroder agreed and said fund members do not mind paying a little more in investment fees if they received better returns.

"So if you look at those figures, then some funds are a little bit cheaper and some funds are a little bit more expensive, but it's very important to look at how those funds have performed," Schroder said.

He said ultimately it was a "scale game" and it would be difficult for smaller funds to extract savings for members.

 "Many of the costs that face super funds are costs that need to be picked up by the fund regardless of size," he said.

However, Proebstl said smaller, more boutique funds might offer members a better service.

"We are not trying to be all things to all people, which some of the larger funds might be trying to be," he said.

Walker said there were always exceptions to the rule.

"I'm not saying that all small funds are dead or big funds are fantastic, but if you are smaller you have some disadvantages to overcome and you may need to find ways to add tangible benefits to members to offset costs," he said.