Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
10 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns over cost-cutting, offshoring ...
icon

How $2.68tn is spread across products and investments

Australia’s $2.68 trillion superannuation system is being shaped not only by the dominance of MySuper and Choice ...

icon

Private credit growth triggers caution at Yarra Capital

As private credit emerges as a fast-growing asset class, Yarra Capital Management remains cautious about the risks that ...

icon

CBA flags end of global rate-cutting cycle

The major bank has indicated that central banks are nearing the end of their rate-cutting cycles, while Trump’s pressure ...

icon

ETF market nears $300bn as international equities lead inflows

The Australian ETF industry is on the cusp of hitting $300 billion in assets under management, with VanEck forecasting ...

icon

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s ...

VIEW ALL

MIS operator gets six-year ban

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
2 minute read

The operator of a South Australian MIS business gets a six-year ban after an ASIC investigation.

Jonathan West has been banned from providing financial services for six years after an ASIC investigation into his private managed investment business.

The ban comes after proceedings were brought by ASIC in the Supreme Court of South Australia and follow a decision by Justice Gray on 9 May 2008.

ASIC found that between June 2003 and March 2007, John West and the business John West & Associates (JWA) operated a managed investment scheme (MIS) that was not registered and did not hold an Australian financial services licence.

JWA also did not provide a product disclosure statement to potential investors and made offers or accepted offers from retail clients to acquire interests in the scheme when it was not registered.

 
 

Despite being put on notice in May 2005 that the scheme was contravening the Corporations Act 2001, West continued to operate the scheme.

ASIC also found that West intended to circumvent a restraining order made by the Supreme Court in March 2007 by continuing to solicit funds from investors in the scheme.

The managed investment business engaged in a scheme of borrowing money from members of the public to on-lend to others on the security of mortgages. It involved more than 60 investors with loans and contributions totalling more than $15.2 million.