Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Advertisement
Markets
10 September 2025 by Adrian Suljanovic

Are big banks entering a new cost-control cycle?

Australia’s biggest banks have axed thousands of jobs despite reporting record profits over the year, fuelling concerns over cost-cutting, offshoring ...
icon

How $2.68tn is spread across products and investments

Australia’s $2.68 trillion superannuation system is being shaped not only by the dominance of MySuper and Choice ...

icon

Private credit growth triggers caution at Yarra Capital

As private credit emerges as a fast-growing asset class, Yarra Capital Management remains cautious about the risks that ...

icon

CBA flags end of global rate-cutting cycle

The major bank has indicated that central banks are nearing the end of their rate-cutting cycles, while Trump’s pressure ...

icon

ETF market nears $300bn as international equities lead inflows

The Australian ETF industry is on the cusp of hitting $300 billion in assets under management, with VanEck forecasting ...

icon

Lonsec joins Count in raising doubts over Metrics funds

Lonsec has cut ratings on three Metrics Credit Partners funds, intensifying scrutiny on the private credit manager’s ...

VIEW ALL

IFSA welcomes FPA fee consultation paper

  •  
By Alice Uribe
  •  
4 minute read

FPA paper will provide good feedback on how planners might move towards a fee-for-service model, IFSA says.

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has welcomed the FPA's consultation paper that outlines plans to phase out commissions.

"The FPA has developed a strong discussion paper for their members to comment on," IFSA deputy chief executive John O'Shaughnessy said.

"It's obviously an issue that's on the table at the moment and this process will get a good response on the members' position on it."

O'Shaughnessy said IFSA would be interested in how the process continues.

 
 

"There are an awful lot of fee-for-service models out there and I think most planning groups now offer the option of a fee-for-service or commission or a hybrid system," O'Shaughnessy said.

"But this consultation process would be a good way to understand how quickly the industry or the planners might move towards that fee-for-service model."

According to O'Shaughnessy, the industry has been moving well to make the consumer aware of what they're paying and what they should expect to be paying.

However, planners still had a choice as to whether to offer a fee-for-service or commission-based service.

On Friday, the FPA released a member consultation paper on financial planning remuneration that recommended all members move to a fee-based or a client-directed remuneration model by 2012.