Only adjusting the twin peaks model for regulators as recommended by the final report from the royal commission will continue to cause confusion and sub-optimal outcomes for the industry and consumers, according to KPMG.
Commissioner Kenneth Hayne had written that he did not favour the creation of a single superannuation watchdog, rather preferring the current model of two bodies and asking that each be tweaked to extend and clarify their roles.
The auditor has said Mr Hayne’s recommendations will overcomplicate incidents and add to regulation costs.
KPMG drew upon an example of a unit pricing error affecting superannuation fund members, in which the report proposes that ASIC will be responsible for the remediation of members (consistent with its consumer protection remit).
APRA would be responsible for the testing the trustee’s policies, practices and the effectiveness of its control environment.
“There is a risk that this approach will add further complexity and cost to the remediation of such issues,” the analysis from KPMG noted.
“The reason is because both regulators will need to be involved in these incidents because of their different remits.
“If this plays out in practice, it will require a number of changes to existing remediation programs because of the involvement, and different approaches, of both regulators.”
AMP has completed an assessment of the impact of the federal government’s Treasury Laws amendment bill and said it would have a multimilli...
In a last-minute deal, the Liberal government has passed its superannuation reforms which it says will protect low-balance accounts from exc...
Industry Super Australia has commended parliament for passing legislation introducing potential jail time for bosses who fail to pay worker...