Only adjusting the twin peaks model for regulators as recommended by the final report from the royal commission will continue to cause confusion and sub-optimal outcomes for the industry and consumers, according to KPMG.
Commissioner Kenneth Hayne had written that he did not favour the creation of a single superannuation watchdog, rather preferring the current model of two bodies and asking that each be tweaked to extend and clarify their roles.
The auditor has said Mr Hayne’s recommendations will overcomplicate incidents and add to regulation costs.
KPMG drew upon an example of a unit pricing error affecting superannuation fund members, in which the report proposes that ASIC will be responsible for the remediation of members (consistent with its consumer protection remit).
APRA would be responsible for the testing the trustee’s policies, practices and the effectiveness of its control environment.
“There is a risk that this approach will add further complexity and cost to the remediation of such issues,” the analysis from KPMG noted.
“The reason is because both regulators will need to be involved in these incidents because of their different remits.
“If this plays out in practice, it will require a number of changes to existing remediation programs because of the involvement, and different approaches, of both regulators.”
One investment manager has said that even though there is a lot of noise around franking credits, the majority of investors will not be affe...
A new report into the superannuation industry from KPMG suggests that 2019 will be defined by mergers and consolidation between super funds ...
A new report has identified almost 400,000 Australian salaried workers are not receiving any superannuation entitlements. ...