Sunsuper and Kinetic Super in merger talks

Sunsuper and Kinetic Super in merger talks

The boards of Sunsuper and Kinetic Super have signed a heads of agreement giving in principle support for a merger between the two industry funds.

Sunsuper and Kinetic Super will merge in late 2017 pending a "comprehensive due diligence process", according to a joint statement by the two funds.

If the merger goes ahead it will create a new $45 billion industry fund with 1.3 million members.

Kinetic Super board chair Frank Gullone said the merger would lead to lower fees as well as "enhanced services and products to all members".

"The two funds are highly complementary and share similar values. We are united by our profit-for-member model and unfaltering focus on maximising members’ retirement savings within a low-cost and transparent structure," Mr Gullone said.

Sunsuper chair Ben Swan said there was a "strong cultural fit" between the two funds.

"With the shared objective of always acting in our customers’ best interests, a successful merger will drive future efficiencies, promote a stronger competitive position in the market and ultimately generate greater value for the combined member and employer base," Mr Swan said.

The joint statement said that while the final decision to merge had not been made, both boards are "committed to the successful conclusion of the merger".

Read more:

China must ‘bite the bullet’ on debt

APRA seeks to reduce 'contagion risk'

Household debt vulnerabilities 'increasing': RBA

March employment figures show solid growth

Equity market tailwinds likely to fade 


Sunsuper and Kinetic Super in merger talks
investordaily image
ID logo
promoted stories


Blake Briggs

FSC loses two senior policy managers

Tim Stewart

John Patrick Moorhead

AMP Capital appoints new CFO

Staff Reporter

Phoebe Ieong

BNY Mellon appoints head of distribution, APAC

Staff Reporter


Doug Morris

What a blockchain-powered ASX should mean

Doug Morris

Lucy O’Carroll

Separating the signals from the noise

Lucy O’Carroll

Dan Bosscher

Could passive investing have structural issues?

Dan Bosscher