The Financial System Inquiry's proposed user-pays funding model for ASIC would amount to "backdoor taxation", an economist has warned.
In an opinion piece published by InvestorDaily sister title ifa, Dr Patrick Carvalho, research fellow at The Centre for Independent Studies, a Sydney-based think tank and policy institute, has taken the government’s proposed “user pays” ASIC funding model to task, warning it may be an example of “[a wolf] in sheep's clothing”.
“This plan is essentially backdoor taxation,” Dr Carvalho warned. “The sugar-coated proposal to directly charge an industry – as if everyday Australians would be spared any cost – is misguided and opportunistic.
“Although there is nothing wrong with a user-pays system per se, the new proposal does not have checks and balances to future regulatory costs and charges.”
While a user pays system seems equitable in theory – and in line with the “Australian fairness tradition” – the Brazilian-born economist argued that the proposal seeks to tax the financial services industry while not accounting for increases in compliance costs.
“Any levy, fees or tax on business, no matter how one calls it, is a government-imposed cost that has to be paid either by stakeholders, customers or employees – or a combination of these individuals,” he said.
“Make no mistake: the new ASIC funding model is backdoor taxation, and the ultimate cost will land on unsuspecting taxpayers.”
APRA has pledged to up its scrutiny of how banks, insurers and superannuation trustees are managing the financial risks of climate change to...
The corporate regulator will have more powers to hold financial services industries to account for misconduct under a new government proposa...
Around 201 investors have received approximately $1.5 million in one of multiple class action claims against a former investment manager a...