X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Events
Subscribe to our Newsletter
  • News
    • Markets
    • Regulation
    • Super
    • M&A
    • Tech
    • Appointments
  • Podcast
  • Webcasts
  • Video
  • Analysis
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Markets
    • Regulation
    • Super
    • M&A
    • Tech
    • Appointments
  • Podcast
  • Webcasts
  • Video
  • Analysis
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Rogue advisers led to AAAFI collapse

The demise of AAA Financial Intelligence (AAAFI) was caused by rogue advisers operating outside their approved product list and subsequent legal and insurance costs, according to the former directors of the collapsed dealer group.

by Staff Writer
July 24, 2013
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

As part of the liquidation process, a report as to affairs (RATA) of the company’s financial position was written by AAAFI’s directors and provided to the appointed liquidator, Bradley Tonks of Lawler Partners, according to a 68-page communication to creditors obtained by InvestorDaily. 

The RATA provided an initial explanation of the company’s failure, pointing to “rogue advisers within the AAA Shares business [an entity wholly owned by AAA FI] engaging in products that were not on the approved product list”, which resulted in “significant claims action against the company”.

X

This claim action led to the “continuous rising cost of professional indemnity” and costs associated with defending itself against “legal activity in respect of debts held against AAA Shares”. 

However, in his communication to creditors, the liquidator said that while he does not “disagree with the directors’ explanation”, other key factors included “poor strategic management of the business and poor economic conditions”.

Speaking to InvestorDaily yesterday, Mr Tonks said the RATA needed to be read within the context of the company’s history.

“Obviously the ASIC [Australian Securities and Investments Commission] attention and cancellation of the licence was a significant issue in the company having to enter administration,” he said.

“But if you look at the concerns raised by ASIC and the allegation of ‘rogue’ advisers, it should be pointed out this is something that actually goes back some time – perhaps five or six years ago,” he added.

“This is when a lot of those issues occurred but they didn’t surface or become apparent until later in the piece. So I suppose in terms of the conduct of the directors, it is not necessarily the directors who were left at the time of the company’s failure who are to blame.”

However, Mr Tonks also said that “in general terms, we have the same areas of focus at this stage” and that “there are some important questions that still need to be answered”.

One of the most pressing concerns still to be addressed in the liquidation process is the distribution of outstanding adviser commissions to former authorised representatives.

One former AAAFI adviser, who has since joined an institutional licensee and spoke to InvestorDaily on condition of anonymity, estimated the total claims value of outstanding commission and brokerage payments by former advisers is as high as $900,000.

Mr Tonks said he had heard the $900,000 figure being referred to, but said this was a preliminary estimate that does not reflect the reality of the claims being filed.

“We are anticipating that claims for outstanding commissions will be in the order of half a million dollars, perhaps a little more,” he said.

At the same time, the liquidator confirmed that some advisers will not be receiving their full claim amounts.

“We currently hold around $170,000 in funds, so if there is $500,000 in claims then obviously we will be in a position where we will have to adjudicate those claims,” he said.

“But while those claims are limited, we hope to be in a position to make distributions in the near future,” he added, calling on aggrieved former advisers to get in touch with the liquidator immediately regarding outstanding commissions if they have not already done so. 

The company’s licence was cancelled in January due to findings of non-compliance with the terms of its Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) by the corporate regulator, including “inadequate technological, human and financial resources, deficiencies in tracking and monitoring advisers, and failure to comply with the obligation to ensure that advisers were appropriately trained and compliant with financial services laws”.

Related Posts

Macquarie Securities faces $35m penalty for misleading conduct

by Adrian Suljanovic
December 19, 2025

Macquarie Securities has admitted misleading conduct and systemic reporting failures as ASIC seeks a $35 million penalty in the NSW...

Crypto poised for long-term growth: MHC Digital

by Olivia Grace-Curran
December 19, 2025

Digital assets are entering a pivotal phase of maturity, with 2026 expected to mark a decisive year for institutional adoption,...

Regulatory action to be private credit tailwind in 2026

by Georgie Preston
December 19, 2025

Private credit has successfully demonstrated its “durability” in the last 12 months, according to Metrics Credit Partners, with the firm flagging multiple positive...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Why U.S. middle market private credit is a powerful income solution for Australian institutional investors

In today’s investment landscape, middle market direct lending, a key segment of private credit, has emerged as an attractive option...

by Tim Warrick
December 2, 2025
Promoted Content

Is Your SMSF Missing Out on the Crypto Boom?

Digital assets are the fastest-growing investment in SMSFs. Swyftx's expert team helps you securely and compliantly add crypto to your...

by Swyftx
December 2, 2025
Promoted Content

Global dividends reach US$519 billion, what’s behind the rise?

Global dividends surged to a record US$518.7 billion in Q3 2025, up 6.2% year-on-year, with financials leading the way. The...

by Capital Group
November 18, 2025
Promoted Content

Why smaller can be smarter in private credit

Over the past 15 years, middle market direct lending has grown into one of the most dynamic areas of alternative...

by Tim Warrick, Managing Director of Principal Alternative Credit, Principal Asset Management
November 14, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Latest Podcast

Podcast

Relative Return Insider: MYEFO, US data and a 2025 wrap up

by Staff Writer
December 18, 2025
After more than two decades, InvestorDaily continues to be an institution that connects and influences Australia’s financial services sector. This influential and integrated media brand connects with leading financial services professionals within superannuation, funds management, financial planning and intermediary distribution through a range of channels, including digital, social, research, broadcast, webcast and events.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • Markets
  • Appointments
  • Regulation
  • Super
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Tech
  • Promoted Content
  • Analysis

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Markets
  • Regulation
  • Super
  • M&A
  • Tech
  • Appointments
  • Podcast
  • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Events
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited