Specialist active managers outperform mixed offerings

— 1 minute read

Specialist active management firms have been found to outperform those that have a greater mix of active and passive products, according to a new study.

The research from University of Technology Sydney (UTS) was based on a sample of more than 2,100 fund families internationally, using data from 1993 to 2015.

Dr Lorenzo Casavecchia of UTS Business School found that funds with a greater percentage of total assets under active management outperformed by 70 basis points a year on average, before fees.


Although the researchers chose to use source data from the US because of the greater detail available, Dr Casavecchia said the findings applied in Australia.

The study considered the excess return economically significant, saying it is risk adjusted.

“The question for us – and for investors – is whether specialisation has implications for investors’ wealth,” Dr Casavecchia said.

The study points to an association with manager skill for generating value for active specialisation, derived in part from the expertise that comes from focusing on one area, from a fund family’s infrastructure and its resources dedicated to private information production.

The paper co-authored with Macquarie University PhD candidate Georgina Ge noted: “Our study shows that fund families with greater asset-based focus on the active segment are more likely to possess better managerial skills at running their active funds.”

The findings also noted an experiment where researchers looked at what happened to funds that were sold, intact, out of more actively focused fund family into a less specialised one.

After the move, the funds would slip in performance and the converse also occurred.

Dr Casavecchia stated the study was not creating a battle between active or passive management, rather it was suggesting investors already in the active sector should be seeking focused active management specialists.

The dark side of specialisation, however, was shown to be greater exposure to losses in periods of market stress.

Investors should also diversify by using a range of actively focused specialists rather than sticking with just one brand, Dr Casavecchia added.

“The findings highlight the significant performance drag experienced by an average equity fund investor if the operational scope and investment philosophy of their fund family isn’t aligned with the primary objective of active funds – to outperform the index,” the paper said.


Specialist active managers outperform mixed offerings
investordaily image
ID logo
Sarah Simpkins

Sarah Simpkins

Sarah Simpkins is a journalist at Momentum Media, reporting primarily on banking, financial services and wealth. 

Prior to joining the team in 2018, Sarah worked in trade media and produced stories for a current affairs program on community radio. 

Sarah has a dual bachelor's degree in science and journalism from the University of Queensland.

You can contact her on [email protected].

related articles

  • Fortunes flag for Perpetual

    Perpetual Investment’s funds under management (FUM) have decreased by $1.1 billion over the last quarter as the market continues its move ...

  • ETPs to surpass $60bn

    The Australian exchange-traded product (ETP) industry is likely to reach $60 billion by the end of the year according to one provider, with ...

  • EMD needs specialists, not generalists

    Investors interested in emerging market debt (EMD) should employ specialist managers in order to succeed, according to a report from Willis ...

promoted stories

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.