Financial institutions have embarked on a “broad-based retreat” from cross-border activities in the decade since the global financial crisis, according to management consultancy McKinsey & Co.
Reflecting on the past decade for a McKinsey Global Institute podcast, Washington, DC-based partner Susan Lund said there has been a clear change in behaviour from global banks since the downturn.
“In the 10 years since the global financial crisis began, cross-border capital flows have fallen by 65 per cent, from over $12 trillion to just over $4 trillion in 2016,” Ms Lund said. “Half of that decline is coming from a decline in cross-border lending and other types of banking activity.”
The decline is symptomatic of decisions by bank boardrooms to reduce foreign exposure, the management consultant said, retreating to an inward-looking focus on national interests.
“[Global banks are] selling foreign businesses,” she said. “They’re allowing loans to expire without renewing them, and they’re selling different types of foreign assets. Overall, there’s been a broad-based retreat toward more domestic activity.”
The first key driver of the trend has been the need for some institutions – particularly those adversely affected by the GFC – to “rebuild capital and recoup losses”, minimising risks and costs associated with offshore ventures.
The second has been increasing regulatory requirements post-GFC, which have forced a greater focus on domestic compliance.
Speaking on the same podcast, Frankfurt-based MGI partner Eckart Windhagen said the retreat has been particularly advanced among eurozone banks, many of which were bullish on cross-border activity before 2008.
While Western and European banks have retreated, some Asia-Pacific financial institutions – including those domiciled in China – have been expanding their global reach over the past decade, especially in emerging markets such as economies in Africa and Latin America.
However, despite this trend, only 9 per cent of total assets of Chinese banks are held outside of China, the McKinsey partners clarified.
Asked whether the retreat of global banks from cross-border activity spells “the end of financial globalisation”, Mr Windhagen responded emphatically in the negative.
“Financial globalisation is surprisingly robust,” he said.
“Financial markets remain deeply interconnected, but with a different profile.
“The global value of foreign investment as a percentage of GDP has been steady since 2007, at around 180 per cent, and now stands as an absolute figure at more than $130 trillion.”
In Australia, we have seen ANZ retreat from part of its Asia-Pacific expansion strategy and NAB divest from its UK banking assets.
The Federal Court has refused to approve a multimillion-dollar penalty for a major bank, despite the bank admitting wrongdoing. ...
The federal opposition has accused Australian banks of withholding information from clients to prevent legal claims of misconduct. ...
ETF investors who follow passive indices could be making active investment choices without realising the performance impact, according to a...