SSGA divests tobacco, weapons shares

SSGA divests tobacco, weapons shares

State Street Global Advisors has announced its divestment of tobacco and controversial weapons shares in its State Street Global Index Plus Trust.


Effective from 31 July, the Index Plus Trust has stripped 12 companies from its investment universe, several of which had business activities that involved tobacco, cluster bomb creation, landmines and chemical, biological and depleted uranium weapons, according to a statement.

The divestment of these shares was due to “demand from the fund’s institutional investors” that it could still meet objectives without the presence of the companies.

There is growing momentum worldwide of investors adopting environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations into their portfolios, the statement said.

“We are keen to make ethical investing more accessible to all institutional investors, not just the very large ones able to utilise a separate mandate,” said SSGA Asia-Pacific head of portfolio strategists Jonathan Shead.

“Our analysis suggests that removing these companies from the fund won’t affect its level of diversification at the country or sector level and that investors will continue to get the broad market exposure they are seeking.”

Following the divestment, the fund still holds approximately 620 companies.

As of 31 March, SSGA holds US$182 billion in ESG assets under management.

 

SSGA divests tobacco, weapons shares
SSGA, State Street Global Advisors, divestment, tobacco, weapons, State Street Global Index Plus Trust, ESG, ethical investment
ID logo
promoted stories

Appointments

Blake Briggs

FSC loses two senior policy managers

Tim Stewart

John Patrick Moorhead

AMP Capital appoints new CFO

Staff Reporter

Phoebe Ieong

BNY Mellon appoints head of distribution, APAC

Staff Reporter

Analysis

Doug Morris

What a blockchain-powered ASX should mean

Doug Morris

Lucy O’Carroll

Separating the signals from the noise

Lucy O’Carroll

Dan Bosscher

Could passive investing have structural issues?

Dan Bosscher