Not all bonds are created equal

Simson Sanaphay
— 1 minute read

Three decades into a bond bull market, disruption has well and truly set in. Citi's Simson Sanaphay attempts to answer the question: are bonds still a worthwhile investment?

We are transitioning from a long period of accommodative monetary policy from central banks to support growth to an environment where rates are no longer falling. Most developed market central banks have increased or intend to increase interest rates to remove stimulus.  

Leading the charge is the US, with a seventh rate increase from the US Federal Reserve shortly anticipated, and more increases predicted in this rate hike cycle. While locally our RBA has kept policy rates on hold, it will raise rates when economic conditions allow.

Broadly speaking, yields (long-term interest rates) follow rates (shorter-term rates). While US government bonds benefited from the historically secular bull market as rates reached generational lows, the recent rise in yields has had a negative effect on bond prices.

Typically, long-dated government bonds’ prices are the most sensitive to interest rates: US Treasuries, Japanese government bonds and European government bonds in particular, as they pay marginal returns.

While generally considered risk-free investments, investors are prone to reduce their allocations if they can attain higher yields from other investments.

Understandably, in this environment, many investors are steering clear of bonds altogether. But it’s important to remember that not all bonds are sensitive to interest rates rises to the same extent.

Choosing the right bond

As a rule of thumb: the level of bonds relates to the age of the investor. For example, if I’m 35 years old, then I should be holding roughly 35 per cent of my investment portfolio in bonds. The older I become, the greater the proportion of bonds in my portfolio.

Theoretically, when I retire I will hold a conservative portfolio, reflecting that my circumstances mean drawdowns are less tolerable and capital losses are harder to recover from.

This well-established allocation guideline highlights that bonds serve a higher purpose than pursuing a pure growth objective or investing for dividends – as both can sometimes be accompanied by market volatility, as is particularly the case in ageing bull markets like ours.

Bonds allow investors to address the issue of higher levels of volatility and the right type of bond can be an effective solution to manage both portfolio market risk and concentration risk whilst generating attractive levels of consistent income.

Citi thinks the increasing number of issuances of investment-grade Australian dollar-denominated bonds by large multinational companies and United States dollar-denominated bonds are two compelling opportunities that will increase portfolio stability and allow investors to draw periodical incomes.

Australian dollar-denominated investment grade bonds from offshore financial institutions have shown resilience during the recent period of volatility, while offering attractive yield levels of up to 5 per cent. In addition, the US Bond Corporate Bond Index yield reached a high of 4 per cent – a return that is more rewarding than term deposits.

Investment-grade bonds are offering yields closer to high-yield bonds but with significantly less risk of default. This means there is less risk for investors to lose their capital, and with half the correlation to equity markets.

Citi’s strategists observe a 44 per cent correlation to global equity markets in Investment Grade corporate paper, when compared with a 78 per cent correlation from High Yield Corporate bonds.

This represents a great opportunity for investors to consider using high quality, high-yield corporate bonds as a way to barbell their equity exposure as part of their portfolio allocations. We see the business cycle as increasingly mature – the ‘goldilocks’ environment of steady growth and low inflation cannot last forever.

Whilst an investor’s equity investments have higher levels of market risk but can present growth, bond investments are a complementary piece of the puzzle. Not only do they generate income, but when taken together, investors can capitalise on lower portfolio risk and volatility through asset class diversification and lower levels of market correlation.

With market expectations of corporate tax cuts, strong earnings growth, synchronised global growth and some equity valuations becoming stretched, it’s important that investors protect their capital gains. We know that bonds will have risks, but it’s just as important to remember that not all bonds are created equal.

In the same way that equity investors consider the differences between growth stocks, dividend yielding stocks, cyclical stocks and defensive stocks, bond investors should apply a likeminded sense of differentiation.

Not all bonds are the same, and they are an essential component of a well-balanced investment portfolio.

Simson Sanaphay is an investment strategist at Citi.


Not all bonds are created equal
ID logo

related articles

promoted stories

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.