The opportunity in global small-caps

The opportunity in global small-caps

The favourable historical outperformance of small-caps over large-caps is a well-established phenomenon of the capital markets, says Lazard Asset Management’s Edward Rosenfeld.

A number of academic studies have shown that small-cap equities – those with market caps from US$300 to US$5 billion – have historically outperformed large-cap equities on a risk-adjusted basis. What is the prevailing reason for this phenomenon? 

Rolf Banz’s 1981 study was one of the first to highlight the small-cap outperformance, challenging the prevailing Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), where an asset’s return is explained by one variable – its systematic risk.

The academic consensus progressed toward introducing additional elements of risk to explain equity returns.

In their seminal paper, Professors Fama and French concluded the outperformance of small-caps over large-caps was due to an element of risk unique to small-caps (ie. investors are compensated for undertaking additional risk).

More recently JP Morgan research also noted the economic sensitivity of small-caps. The study showed that since 1990, the revenue growth rate of European small- and mid-cap stocks has been 2.2 times nominal GDP growth.

Furthermore, we don’t think this history of outperformance is the result of just one or two outsized years or biased toward a given start date, as evidenced by analysing rolling periods.

Over the last 15 years, on a rolling one-year basis, global small-caps outperformed large-caps 67 per cent of the time.

Over three- and five-year rolling periods small-caps outperformed large-caps in 83 per cent and 96 per cent of the time, respectively.

With this in mind, a small-cap allocation on its own can be rewarding, especially for investors with longer time horizons.

This small-cap performance has historically been enhanced by an active stock selection approach.

Historically, small-cap active managers have a better record of adding value than their large-cap counterparts.

Over the past 10 years, active small-cap managers have added more than 150 basis points of outperformance per year, while large-cap managers have added just over 60.

We believe this is because the market for small-caps is not as efficient as the large-cap market. Globally, the small-cap opportunity set is vast and at the same time is thinly covered by analysts. Currently, around 20 per cent of small-cap stocks in the MSCI Small Cap Index do not have any sell-side coverage, which would be unthinkable in large- or mega-cap equities.


In addition, global small-cap managers have a much larger investable universe than global large-cap managers – the MSCI World Small Cap Index has 4,265 constituents, compared with the MSCI World Index’s 1,645 constituents.

With nearly three times as many companies in the index, small-cap managers have a much wider opportunity set than their large-cap counterparts.

There are of course risks associated with small cap companies.

In general, small-cap companies have a more varied record of corporate performance than large-cap companies.

And, while they strongly outperform in growth environments, many small-cap companies face difficulties when the economy contracts.

For Australian investors, global small-caps can be an important diversifier. If an investor is overexposed to banks or resources, many global small-cap stocks will have very low correlation to these names.

The investable universe for global small-caps is currently composed of a much higher weighting of cyclical categories, such as the consumer discretionary, industrials, and information technology sectors. In many cases the revenues of these small-cap companies are less likely to be exposed to any downturn in the Australian economy.

Small-caps can be riskier than large-cap companies.

However, when you consider the return trade-off and the alpha potential active managers can offer, they remain a potentially compelling risk-adjusted proposition, particularly for Australian investors needing diversification.

Fundamental stock selection can also be important in managing the risks of investing in global small-cap companies.

Edward Rosenfeld is a portfolio manager and analyst at Lazard Asset Management.


The opportunity in global small-caps
Edward Rosenfeld
ID logo
promoted stories


Blake Briggs

FSC loses two senior policy managers

Tim Stewart

John Patrick Moorhead

AMP Capital appoints new CFO

Staff Reporter

Phoebe Ieong

BNY Mellon appoints head of distribution, APAC

Staff Reporter


Doug Morris

What a blockchain-powered ASX should mean

Doug Morris

Lucy O’Carroll

Separating the signals from the noise

Lucy O’Carroll

Dan Bosscher

Could passive investing have structural issues?

Dan Bosscher