X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Events
Subscribe to our Newsletter
  • News
    • Markets
    • Regulation
    • Super
    • M&A
    • Tech
    • Appointments
  • Podcast
  • Webcasts
  • Video
  • Analysis
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Markets
    • Regulation
    • Super
    • M&A
    • Tech
    • Appointments
  • Podcast
  • Webcasts
  • Video
  • Analysis
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News Super

Crossbenchers oppose super governance bill

Four Senate crossbenchers have sided with Labor and the Greens against the government's proposal to change the governance of superannuation fund boards, potentially killing the bill.

by Tim Stewart
December 3, 2015
in News, Super
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Senators John Madigan, Glenn Lazarus, Jacqui Lambie and Nick Xenophon have released a joint statement with Labor Senator Sam Dastyari and Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson stating they will not support the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015.

The bill, which was introduced to parliament on 17 September by then assistant treasurer Josh Frydenberg, proposed to force industry superannuation funds to increase the number of independent directors on their boards to one third (along with the imposition of an independent chair).

X

The changes have been vociferously opposed by industry super fund lobby groups Industry Super Australia (ISA) and the Association of Superannuation Trustees of Australia (AIST).

The decision by the crossbenchers to oppose the bill is likely the result of effective lobbying by the ISA and AIST, with the statement by the crossbenchers noting that both industry fund groups have “agreed to undertake a comprehensive review of not-for-profit fund governance to propose a code of best practice”.

“Crossbench and opposition senators think this bill goes too far. Senator John Madigan, Senator Glenn Lazarus, and Senator Jacqui Lambie have suggested an alternative to imposing these changes by legislation, and instead propose an industry review of not-for-profit fund governance,” said the statement.

“In addition, the Senators have also recommended the review consider how industry funds can increase their investment in Australia, thereby supporting the local economy and the growth of jobs.”

The Financial Services Council (FSC), which represents retail superannuation funds that already have independent directors in place, released a statement saying it “looks forward to the continued discussion of the governance of superannuation funds”.

“The proposal for independent directors on the superannuation trustee boards is a moderate reform that will apply to all superannuation funds – retail, industry, corporate and public sector,” said the FSC.

“The government’s Financial System Inquiry and the previous Labor government’s Cooper Review both recommended the appointment of independent directors on superannuation trustee boards.”

Former FSC chief executive John Brogden, who now heads up the Australian Institute of Company Directors, said the decision by the Senate crossbenchers puts the interests of unions and employer groups ahead of superannuation fund members.

“This decision rejects all tenets of good governance in the modern era. It defies common sense that unions and employer groups would deny their members the benefits of independence on their boards,” Mr Brogden said.

“Independent directors are widely recognised as a critical element of good corporate governance. The importance of independence is recognised in both the ASX Corporate Governance Council guidelines that apply to listed companies and the standards that APRA imposes on banks and insurers.

“The industry review of governance standards that is now proposed by Industry Super Australia and the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees would need to be built on the foundation of internationally accepted principles of governance, which includes the importance of director independence,” Mr Brogden said.

Current investment returns – the strength of which the ISA and AIST often point to – are “not the sole litmus test for effective governance nor is it guaranteed that they will continue if current board structures are maintained”, he added.

Related Posts

Nvidia surge stokes AI-bubble fears

by Adrian Suljanovic
November 21, 2025

A renewed surge in Nvidia’s earnings outlook has intensified debate over whether the artificial intelligence boom is veering into bubble...

APRA report highlights super’s outsized role in times of crisis

by Georgie Preston
November 21, 2025

In its newly released Systemic Risk Outlook report, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has flagged rising financial system interconnectedness...

Tariff slowdowns clash with AI optimism heading into 2026

by Georgie Preston
November 21, 2025

Despite widespread scepticism over President Trump’s follow-through on tariffs - highlighted once again this week by his dramatic reversal on...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Global dividends hit a Q3 record, led by financials.

Global dividends surged to a record US$518.7 billion in Q3 2025, up 6.2% year-on-year, with financials leading the way. The...

by Capital Group
November 18, 2025
Promoted Content

Why smaller can be smarter in private credit

Over the past 15 years, middle market direct lending has grown into one of the most dynamic areas of alternative...

by Tim Warrick, Managing Director of Principal Alternative Credit, Principal Asset Management
November 14, 2025
Promoted Content

Members Want Super Funds to Step Up Security

For most Australians, superannuation is their largest financial asset outside the family home. So, when it comes to digital security,...

by MUFG Pension & Market Services
October 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring Can Be Brilliant: Why Steady Investing Builds Lasting Wealth

In financial markets, drama makes headlines. Share prices surge, tumble, and rebound — creating the stories that capture attention. But...

by Zagga
October 2, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Latest Podcast

Podcast

Relative Return Insider: Economic shifts, political crossroads, and the digital future

by InvestorDaily team
November 13, 2025
After more than two decades, InvestorDaily continues to be an institution that connects and influences Australia’s financial services sector. This influential and integrated media brand connects with leading financial services professionals within superannuation, funds management, financial planning and intermediary distribution through a range of channels, including digital, social, research, broadcast, webcast and events.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • Markets
  • Appointments
  • Regulation
  • Super
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Tech
  • Promoted Content
  • Analysis

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Markets
  • Regulation
  • Super
  • M&A
  • Tech
  • Appointments
  • Podcast
  • Webcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Events
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited