Encourage 'inefficient' super funds to merge

Tim Stewart
— 1 minute read

The government should encourage super fund consolidation by creating a more transparent framework for merger proposals, argues Rice Warner.

In a submission to the Productivity Commission's inquiry into superannuation efficiency and competitiveness, Rice Warner said it is "clear" that the largest super funds have "significant advantages" over smaller funds.

These advantages include lower fees for members due to the benefits of scale, better governance standards, access to unlisted investment opportunities, and better range of service to members, said Rice Warner.


The submission argued that MySuper funds should be part of a trust fund with assets exceeding $2 billion and/or active members exceeding 50,000.

According to APRA there were 151 funds with assets below $2 billion as at June 2015 – 34 of which had no assets disclosed at all.

Rice Warner said a much greater number of approaches to merge have been made by funds than have proceeded to completion – even when there was a reasonable case made that both sets of members would benefit from the merger.

"Clearly boards can reject approaches, but the lack of transparency regarding merger proposals appears to be hindering the process," said the submission.

While there do not appear to be problems with funds formulating and presenting proposals to other funds, there are issues with the way the proposals are considered, said Rice Warner – particularly when it comes to the way decisions are reached in members' best interests.

"The process would be enhanced by a formal framework for approaches and the consideration of those approaches," said the submission.

The Productivity Commission should consider a similar system to the process for listed firms entering merger discussions, said Rice Warner, including:

  • A consistent framework for funds to approach other funds with merger proposals;
  • Specific provisions that a board receiving a proposal must formally consider that proposal in the best interests of members;
  • Notification to APRA by the board when an approach is rejected;
  • Notification to fund members by the board when an approach is rejected; and
  • Provisions requiring the board to take a proposal to a vote of members in specific circumstances.

Read more:

Credit quality deteriorating, says Moody's

Investors keep faith with active management

Acurity Online integrates digital advice service

Markets reserving judgement on Trump

AMP Capital restructures, executives depart


Encourage 'inefficient' super funds to merge
ID logo

related articles

promoted stories

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.