investor daily logo

Openmarkets pays record $4.5m penalty

By Reporter
1 minute read

Online stockbroker Openmarkets has paid a record $4.5 million penalty.

In a statement on Thursday, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) confirmed that Openmarkets Australia has paid the largest ever penalty imposed by the Markets Disciplinary Panel (MDP) of $4.5 million and entered into an enforceable undertaking in order to comply with an infringement notice issued by the MDP.

“This outcome sends a clear message to market participants that breaches of market integrity rules will result in substantial penalties that should not be seen as a cost of doing business,” the corporate regulator said.

It noted that the MDP would have imposed a significantly higher penalty, however reduced the total amount due to factors that included Openmarkets entering into an enforceable undertaking and not contesting the alleged contraventions.


ASIC explained that its investigation commenced when routine surveillance identified repeated suspicious trading by an Openmarkets client. Namely, the client had placed simultaneous bid and ask orders in the same security and at the same price on 2,011 occasions (Same Price Orders).

“Many of these suspicious orders formed part of an unusual series of orders involving the rapid cancellation or amendment away from priority of large volume orders. Notably, the same Openmarkets client was responsible for suspicious trading resulting in the 2017 infringement notice and the present outcome,” the regulator said.

The regulator added the MDP had reasonable grounds to believe that Openmarkets had contravened numerous market integrity rules over a period of several years and was satisfied as to the following matters:

  • Openmarkets had reasonable grounds to suspect that the Same Price Orders were likely to have the effect of creating an artificial trading price or a false or misleading appearance of active trading.
  • Openmarkets had not appropriately calibrated its post-trade surveillance system (the Nasdaq SMARTS system). This resulted in an unmanageable volume of alerts, most of which were not reviewed.
  • Openmarkets did not have appropriate supervisory procedures to ensure compliance with requirements under the market integrity rules dealing with suspicious trading.
  • Openmarkets had insufficient staff with the appropriate skills, knowledge, and experience to carry out effective trade surveillance.
  • Openmarkets had again failed to engage the anti-wash trade filter. The MDP considered this was “serious” and “very reckless” because such a failure was also one of the findings of the abovementioned 2017 infringement notice (see below for details of this notice). Further, Openmarkets failed to conduct any sufficient review of the appropriateness of its automatic order processing (AOP) filter settings until several years after they were established.
  • Openmarkets failed to prevent unprofessional conduct by senior staff. This included a senior staff member warning a client in relation to SMARTS alerts that they triggered, instead of escalating the matter to compliance. The MDP considered this was “highly unprofessional and an aggravating factor”.
  • Openmarkets failed to submit suspicious activity reports to ASIC in relation to further clients engaging in suspicious trading.
  • A back-office system transition inadvertently resulted in trust account deficiencies of up to approximately $20,000,000 on 35 consecutive business days from 18 August to 5 October 2021.

Moreover, the MDP considered the majority of alleged contraventions were interconnected, as they related to Openmarkets’ failure to have a compliance framework in place that could deal with suspicious trading.

Moving forward, the enforceable undertaking requires Openmarkets to appoint an independent expert to assess, report on, and identify any necessary remedial actions relevant to the adequacy of Openmarkets’ organisational and technical resources and the design and operational effectiveness of its arrangements, relating to trade surveillance, client on-boarding, and client money.

ASIC noted that “compliance with the infringement notice is not an admission of guilt or liability, and Openmarkets is not taken to have contravened subsection 798H(1) of the Corporations Act”.

The regulator also added that on top of the MDP infringement notice, it has banned Openmarkets’ former acting head of trading and designated trading representative (DTR), Virginia Owczarek, from providing any financial service for three years, after it determined that she accepted a $2,000 payment from a client for stock tips and engaged in inappropriate and unprofessional communications.

ASIC said Ms Owczarek is “not fit and proper” to provide financial services or to participate as an officer in the financial services industry.

Openmarkets pays record $4.5m penalty

Online stockbroker Openmarkets has paid a record $4.5 million penalty.

ID logo

Comments powered by CComment