APRA chairman Wayne Byres faced a parliamentary committee last week where he was asked what role the regulator played in removing NAB’s chairman and CEO.
Mr Byres appeared before the Senate Economics Legislation Committee in Canberra on Thursday (21 February), where he was questioned by committee chair and Liberal senator Jane Hume about APRA’s approach to enforcement and the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR).
The BEAR came into for the major banks on 1 July 2018 and will include all other ADIs from 1 July this year.
“Did APRA have anything to do with the ousting of Mr Henry and Mr Thorburn from NAB?” Ms Hume asked.
Mr Byres neither confirmed nor denied APRA’s involvement, but stated: “I don’t want to get into commenting on individual organisations.”
The royal commission final report recommended a strengthening of APRA’s prudential and supervisory framework.
“We have some new powers and we have asked for those powers for some time; the parliament is now hopefully giving them to us and it is our intent to use them,” Mr Byres told the committee.
“We’ve wanted them for a reason. We will still be, at our heart though, a prudential regulator. We will not be all of a sudden a police force. But I think we can do more, particularly if we are well-equipped to do so, quicker than we have in the past.”
The regulator is currently reviewing its enforcement strategy with the assistance of an Independent Expert Panel. This review has a wide scope that includes consideration of when to hold individuals to account (including under the BEAR), when it would be appropriate to take enforcement action to achieve general and specific deterrence in appropriate cases and APRA’s governance and other arrangements in relation to enforcement decisions.
The report is expected to be completed at the end of March 2019 and published shortly thereafter.
Just one financial penalty has so far arisen out of the cases referred to ASIC following the royal commission, despite the regulator suggest...