The disparity between bank CEO pay and average weekly earnings is contributing to the uncompetitive nature of Australia's economy, argues progressive think tank The Australia Institute.
The GFC+10: Executive Pay in Australia report released yesterday by the Australia Institute has scrutinised the pay packages of executives at Australia’s biggest companies 10 years on from the global financial crisis.
Homing in on banks, which had “been a particular focus of attention” in recent times, the report found NAB and Commonwealth Bank of Australia bosses respectively earned 108 and 93 times the average weekly earnings in 2017.
“Pay for the NAB CEO peaked in 2004 but even if we ignore that spike the data still show that CEO pay was increasing rapidly during the bulk of the 2000s, as people were expressing the most concern.”
For the chief executive of CBA at the time, the spike in pay was widest in the lead-up to the global financial crisis.
In fact, seven- or eight-figure remuneration packages were “likely to have played an important role in the global financial crisis” wherein chief executives risked long-term performance for short-term gains, the report said.
Such a significant gap in the earnings of average workers compared with top executives also reflected "to a large extent the uncompetitive nature of the modern Australian economy".
“It has to be stressed that the issue of massive CEO pay is one associated with industry concentration and the dominance of big business in the Australian economy,” it said.
“According to tax office data 390,774 companies reported a positive income and declared taxable income of $281 billion, giving the ‘average’ company an income of $719,201 in 2015.
“An economy dominated by ‘average’ companies could never pay CEOs anything like the amounts going to the CEOs of the top Australian oligopolies and monopolies,” said the report.
While “growth in CEO pay was quite dramatic in the lead up to around 2007 or 2008” and had moderated since then, the report concluded remuneration for these top executives “remains excessive”.
The Federal Court has refused to approve a multimillion-dollar penalty for a major bank, despite the bank admitting wrongdoing. ...
The federal opposition has accused Australian banks of withholding information from clients to prevent legal claims of misconduct. ...
ETF investors who follow passive indices could be making active investment choices without realising the performance impact, according to a...