Australian managed funds that charge higher fees don’t always offer better performance, according to a new report by Canstar.
Canstar's 2017 Managed Funds Star Ratings report compared 165 products offered to Australian investors and found that higher management fees don’t guarantee better performance.
By plotting the 10 year return versus the total cost for nine different asset classes, Canstar's report found no correlation between the two metrics for the managed funds analysed.
“A fund may tell you their higher fee is justified because they are more active in investing your money, and the high fee is cancelled out by higher returns,” said the report.
“[Fund managers] might say that their fees are tiered based on how much you have invested, so as your investment grows you naturally pay more for its management, but ultimately, you should check the numbers for yourself before you invest.”
Canstar said there was “more to life than chasing the lowest fees” but that investors should still be mindful that fees can eat in to returns if the investor isn’t careful.
The research additionally found that multi-sector aggressive managed funds had the highest average fees, charging a management-expense ratio (MER) of 1.2 per cent, with Australian cash and fixed income’s average 0.47 per cent MER the lowest.
BetaShares has established what it calls the first UK-focused ETF on the ASX, tracking Britain’s sharemarket benchmark, the FTSE 100. ...
The regulatory landscape has fundamentally changed since the Hayne royal commission and entities must engage with regulators in new ways in ...
Perpetual Investment has recorded net outflows of $1.1 billion for the fourth quarter of 2019, while its funds under management fell by $300...