Wednesday, 8 February, 2012 9:54 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: equities boost, apogee financial, blackrock sma, insurance comm, anz custody,
 

Operational risk reserves already in place

Won't be a major disruption

By Darin Tyson-Chan
Wed 11 Aug 2010

New research has shown a requirement to implement operational reserves for super funds wouldn't be a major imposition.


A recent Mercer survey of superannuation funds has found a large number of them already establishing and drawing upon operational risk reserves as part of their day-to-day running.

While it is not currently a statutory requirement for Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) regulated funds to have these types of reserves the possibility exists it soon will be if the government implements the Cooper review's recommendations.

The research house study found 75 per cent of funds surveyed admitted they already had an operational risk reserve in place. This had increased from a proportion of 56 per cent that had established one of these reserves in 2008.

A total number of 28 super funds took part in the survey covering industry funds, the public sector and corporate superannuation with 21 funds having already set up and operational risk reserve and a further seven funds in this group having actually used the reserve last year.

"If the recommendation on operational risk reserve is adopted, the good news is it won't be a quantum leap for many super funds, instead it is a continuation of good practice within the industry," Mercer retirement, risk and finance director David Knox said.

"The fact that one third of funds accessed their reserve in a single year highlights the advantage of the practice. Operational risk events do occur but with a reserve in place the fund is able to continue to operate after the event and members aren't penalised," he said.

Knox emphasised the importance for there to be flexibility in creating these reserves as every fund was different and a one size fits all approach may end up being detrimental to a fund's members.

According to Knox it was also important to distinguish between capital reserves and risk reserves as each is used for a different but distinct purpose, with capital reserves to be used for solvency requirements only.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

GESB drops responsible share option »
GESB has dropped the AMP managed responsible investment option.

Axa flags fee cuts for North platform »
Axa Asia Pacific will reduce administration fees for its popular North platform in April.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot