Wednesday, 8 February, 2012 8:55 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: global fund, david lees, superannuation research, currency, conflicts,
 

Aussie super funds focus too much on peers

Focus should be on member outcomes

By Wouter Klijn
Mon 09 Aug 2010

Australian super funds are obsessed by peer group results.


Australian super funds focus too much on how their competitors are performing rather than delivering the best results for their members, the Fund Executives Association Limited (FEAL) National Conference was told this week.

"You have the world's most cultured and intelligent pension system - credit where it is due - but you pretty much have the world's worst case of peer group obsession," Towers Watson global head of investment content Roger Urwin told the conference.

"Your investment industry lacks leadership as a result of that, because who speaks for the average member exactly? In this you are not only not serving your own interests, but also not those of your members."

Urwin, who is based in Towers Watson's London office, argued Australian super funds should spend more time on creating products that delivered the best outcomes for members and, therefore, should focus more on real returns.

He said a review of products should also incorporate the costs and fees of superannuation products.

"[Super System Review panel chairman Jeremy] Cooper does have a very good point, that we have many investment products that don't come out ahead after the costs," he said.

"And we count too optimistically and self-servingly on the skills and talents of certain investment segments."

Urwin was supported in his views by Schroder Investment Management chief executive Greg Cooper.

"The biggest issue at the moment is accountability. We might refer back to peer groups and benchmarks, but all they do is remove the accountability of capital outcomes," Cooper said.

"I think, broadly, the industry has missed the point. We spend far too much time looking at the construct of our portfolio, rather than trying to understand what it is that we are trying to achieve.

"I want real returns and not relative ones. I don't care about peer groups and if I wasn't in the industry, I certainly wouldn't be looking in the newspapers at the [league] tables."

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

GESB drops responsible share option »
GESB has dropped the AMP managed responsible investment option.

Axa flags fee cuts for North platform »
Axa Asia Pacific will reduce administration fees for its popular North platform in April.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot