Saturday, 4 February, 2012 2:49 PM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: apra no, macpherson kelley, australian based, professional planning, compare top,
 

Clarity needed on Cooper advice reforms: AMP

Insurance needs careful consideration

By Christine St Anne
Wed 14 Jul 2010

Intra-fund advice needs to be clearly defined while superannuation in the award system needs to be reviewed sooner, AMP Financial Services chief says.


More clarity is needed on some key Cooper review recommendations, including the role of advice in superannuation, AMP Financial Services managing director Craig Meller said.

In particular, advice needs to be properly defined under the Cooper review's proposals, according to Meller.

"Advice in financial services is always bandied around but not well understood," Meller said at an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) lunch yesterday in Sydney.

"The Cooper review has segmented MySuper into intra-fund advice and broader advice. However, it has defined the former and not the latter."

Meller said intra-fund does not need to meet the "know the customer obligations" inherent in a full advice regime.

"So if a member contacts a call centre wanting to know whether to put $10,000 into super or pay off their mortgage, the fund cannot provide them with advice as the scope [for providing such advice] goes beyond intra-fund advice," Meller said.

The potential for the wrong decision to be made is larger when a person's investable assets are greater, he said.

"While at AMP we support the principles [behind intra-fund advice], advice needs to be defined clearly so that it remains broadly appropriate in all circumstances," Meller said.

Meller said Cooper's recommendations for insurance in superannuation will also have to be carefully considered so that underinsurance is not exacerbated.

He also called for a review into superannuation in the award system ahead of the implementation of MySuper.

The role of MySuper needs to be considered in the industrial award system, as the current monopoly of some funds that are entrenched in the awards has little incentive to lower costs, according to Meller.

"The issue needs to be resolved before MySuper is implemented. Otherwise, MySuper won't live up to its promises for many Australians," he said.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

GESB drops responsible share option »
GESB has dropped the AMP managed responsible investment option.

Axa flags fee cuts for North platform »
Axa Asia Pacific will reduce administration fees for its popular North platform in April.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot