Thursday, 9 February, 2012 9:20 AM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: scott murray, home insurance, property returns, sean, kelley,
 

FPA stays firm on risk commission stance

Market change needed, not regulation

By Kate Kachor
Thu 20 May 2010

The FPA plans to stay true to its stance on risk commissions, calling on the government and industry to remove any perceived conflicts.


The FPA's view on commission payments for risk products remains unaltered, claiming industry response and not regulation may facilitate change.

"We are anticipating there is much work to be done at the product level so that they can facilitate a move away from commissions to fees," FPA acting chief executive Deen Sanders said.

"We think the market will respond to the challenges and ensure that they can deliver both effective and affordable risk insurance advice.

"We'd like to see the market respond to that without necessarily requiring any further increase in regulatory approach or bans."

Sanders's comments come as the federal government calls for industry consultation regarding proposed regulatory changes tabled in the Future of Financial Advice reforms.

The FPA has challenged the government to think carefully about the consequences of risk, even though the advice association recognises there is still a perception of conflict, Sanders said.

"If the government were to offer tax deductibility for fees in this space then that would obviously give us reason to potentially consider how that would be a benefit to Australian consumers and whether or not that would allow us to facilitate a move in that space as well," he said.

Sanders said the FPA stands by its view on risk commissions, stating the association could find no link between commission payments and reported cases of mis-selling of products.

"In our position earlier in the year we arrived at the idea that we weren't prepared to ban commission payments on risk insurance because there were quite clearly a number of consequences that would almost immediately flow and one of those would obviously be an exacerbation of the underinsurance market," he said.

"We could find no demonstrated link and we also note, by the way, that nor could the Financial Services Authority in the UK demonstrate any link between commission payments and reported cases of mis-selling."

In March this year, the FPA announced it would not ban commission payments for risk products.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

Managers' outlook for 2012

Despite market volatility, investment managers are still seeing opportunities.... Watch»

Investing in low-growth markets

The world might be turning Japanese as it faces a decade of lost growth, says international author Satyajit Das.
... Watch»

Overcoming the culture of risk

In an in-depth interview, international author Satyajit Das gives us an insight into how global finance enslaved the world.... Watch»

Wouter Klijn

Towards an adequate retirement

The two non-consecutive alphabetic letters encountered most often last week caused more controversy than the underlying policy they represented, Wouter Klijn writes.... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

IFM wins $500m infrastructure mandate »
IFM has been selected to lead CalSTRS' first foray into infrastructure.

Magellan firm amid European crisis »
The Magellan Global Fund remained fully invested during the past six months.

Kate Kachor

The final siren

The Industry Superannuation Network (ISN) has once again stuck its nose in where it's not wanted.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot